Family Poultry (FP) as a Tool for Improving Gender Equity and Women’s Empowerment in Developing Countries: Evidence from Bangladesh
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
The study assessed the integrated gender issues of family poultry production in developing countries with evidence in Bangladesh. The result draws attention to the widespread acknowledgment of the critical roles of gender in family poultry production system. The results show that women hold the maximum of the ownership (90.58%, p=0.0001) and responsible for the caring of (93.94%, p=0.0001) family poultry in Bangladesh, likewise other developing countries. The result reveals that women control over the decision-making for the selling of eggs and birds in Bangladesh. Women mostly (94.58%) hold the knowledge useful in the prevention and treatment of poultry illness; however, their role was found low (3.46%) in buying medicine and vaccines for poultry as compared to men (96.54%) in Bangladesh. The findings show that women were nearly two times more willing than men to adopt improved rearing technologies related to family poultry production. Both women and men are impacted indifferently by lower adoption of scientific poultry-keeping technologies. Women are independently facing more problems in access to knowledge, training, services, marketing systems, and financial services related to family poultry production. Despite having many limitations, it is clear that family poultry empowers women through asset accumulation and increasing their decision-making ability in the families and the broader community. The study also highlights the necessity of considering an engendered approach in policy and operational level for the family poultry development.
References
-
Alders, R. (2004). Poultry for Profit and Pleasure. Diversification Booklet No. 3; Agricultural Support Systems Division; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy.
Google Scholar
1
-
Dolberg, F. and Petersen, P.H. Poultry as a tool in Poverty eradication and promotion of gender equality. Proceedings of a workshop; The Danish Agricultural and Rural Development Advisers' Forum: Tune Landboskole, Denmark, 22-26 March 1999.
Google Scholar
2
-
de Bruyn, J., Wong, J., Bagnol, B., Pengelly, B. and Alders, R. (2015). Family poultry and food and nutrition security. CAB. Reviews, 10, 1–9.
Google Scholar
3
-
Dumas, S.E., Lungu, L., Mulambya, N., Daka, W., McDonald, E., Steubing, E., Lewis, T., Backel, K., Jange, J., Lucio-Martinez, B., Lewis, D. and Travis, A.J. (2016). Sustainable smallholder poultry interventions to promote food security and social, agricultural, and ecological resilience in the Luangwa Valley, Zambia. Food Security, 8, 507–520.
Google Scholar
4
-
Guèye, E.F. (2000). The role of family poultry in poverty alleviation, food security and the promotion of gender equality in rural Africa. Outlook on Agriculture, 29, 129-136. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000000101293130.
Google Scholar
5
-
Guèye, E.F. (2002). Family poultry research and development in low-income food-deficit countries: approaches and prospects. Outlook on Agriculture, 31, 13-21. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000002101293822.
Google Scholar
6
-
Meinzen-Dick, R., Behrman, J.A, Menon, P. and Quisumbing, A.R. Gender: A Key dimension linking agricultural programs to improved nutrition and health (Based on 2020 Conference Brief). International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI): Washington DC, USA, 2011, pp. 135-144.
Google Scholar
7
-
Mapiye, C.; Sibanda, S. (2005). Constraints and opportunities of village chicken production systems in the smallholder sector of Rushinga District of Zimbabwe. Livestock Res. Rural Dev. 17, Article #115http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd17/10/mapi17115.htm.
Google Scholar
8
-
Miao, Z.H., Glatz, P.C. and Ru, Y.J. (2005). Free-range poultry production-A review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 18, 113-132. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.113
Google Scholar
9
-
Kitalyi, A.J. (1998). Village chicken production systems in rural Africa: household and food security and gender issues. Animal Production and Health Paper 142; FAO: Rome, Italy. http://fao.org/docrep/003/w898e/w8989e00.htm.
Google Scholar
10
-
Akinola, L.A.F. and Essien, A. (2011). Relevance of rural poultry production in developing countries with special reference to Africa. World's Poultry Science Journal, 67(4), 697–705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0043933911000778
Google Scholar
11
-
Fattah, K.A. Poultry as a tool in poverty eradication and promotion of gender equality. In: Proceedings of a Workshop on Poultry as a Tool in Poverty Eradication and Promotion of Gender Equality (Dolberg, F.; Petersen, P.H.; Eds.); Tune, Denmark, 2000, pp. 16-28.
Google Scholar
12
-
Pym, R. Poultry Genetics and Breeding in Developing Countries. Poultry Development Review; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2013, pp. 80–83.
Google Scholar
13
-
Ahmed, S., Haque, T.S., Rahman, S., Sultana, M.R., Rahman, M.M., Islam, M.S., Kabir, A., Moni, M.I.Z., Haque, M.H. and Khaton, R. (2019). Loss of Domestic Poultry Due to Flood and the State of Veterinary Care Services in Flood-Prone Areas of Bangladesh. International Journal of Poultry Science, 18, 231-237.https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2019.231.237.
Google Scholar
14
-
Saleque, A. “Scaling-up: critical factors in leadership, management, human resource development and institution building in going from pilot projects to large scale implementation – the BRAC poultry model in Bangladesh.” Proceedings of a workshop on poultry as a tool in poverty eradication and promotion of gender equality, Tune, Denmark, 22-26 March 1999.
Google Scholar
15
-
Bagnol, B. (2009). Gender issues in small-scale family poultry production: experiences with Newcastle Disease and Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza control. World's Poultry Science Journal, 65, 231–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0043933909000191
Google Scholar
16
-
Thieme, O., Sonaiya, F., Rota, A., Guèye, F., Dolberg, F. and Alders, R. Defining family poultry production systems and their contribution to livelihoods; In: Decision tools for family poultry development; Animal Production and Health Guidelines No. 16; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2014; pp. 3-8.
Google Scholar
17
-
Otte, J., Nugent, R. and McLeod, A. (2004). “Transboundary Animal Diseases: Assessment of SocioEconomic Impacts and Institutional Responses;” FAO Livestock Policy Discussion Paper No. 9; Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy.
Google Scholar
18
-
Otte, J., Roland-Holst, D., Pfeiffer, D., Soares-Magalhaes, R., Rushton, J., Graham, J. and Silbergeld, E. “Industrial Livestock Production and Global Health Risks;” Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative (PPLPI) Research Report, June 2007.
Google Scholar
19
-
Bravo-Baumann, H. (2000). “Genderand Livestock: Capitalisation of Experiences on Livestock Projects and Gender;” Working document; Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation: Bern, Switzerland.
Google Scholar
20
-
Niamir-Fuller, M. (1994). “Women Livestock Managers in the Third World: A Focus on Technical Issues Related to Gender Roles in Livestock Production;” IFAD: Rome, Italy.
Google Scholar
21
-
IFAD. (2004). “Livestock Services and the Poor: A Global Initiative; Collecting, Coordinating and Sharing Experiences;” International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD): Rome, Italy.
Google Scholar
22
-
Bradley, F.A. A historical review of women’s contributions to poultry production and the implications for poultry development policy. Proceedings 19th World’s Poultry Congress, Vol. 2, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992, pp. 693-696.
Google Scholar
23
-
Bhurtel, R. Women’s participation in rural poultry development. Proceedings 20th World’s Poultry Congress, Vol. 3, New Delhi, India, 1996, pp. 413-417.
Google Scholar
24
-
Khan, A.G. Women as a resource target for rural poultry production in India. Proceedings 10th European Poultry Conference, Vol. 2, Jerusalem, Israel, 1998, pp. 604-606.
Google Scholar
25
-
Rushton, J. and Ngongi S.N. (1998). Poultry, Women and Development: Old Ideas, New Applications and the Need for More Research; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy.
Google Scholar
26
-
Chant, S. Towards a (re)-conceptualisation of the “feminisation of poverty”: reflections on gender-differentiated poverty from The Gambia, Philippines and Costa Rica. In Chant, S. (ed.) International Handbook of Gender and Poverty; Concepts, Research, Policy; Edward Elgar Publishing:Northampton, MA, USA, 2010, pp. 111–116.
Google Scholar
27
-
Meinzen-Dick, R., Quisumbing, A., Behrman, J., Biermayr-Jenzano, P., Wilde, V. andNoordeloos, M. (2010). Engendering Agricultural Research.IFPRI Discussion Paper 973; IFPRI: Washington DC, USA.http://www.ifpri.org/publication/engendering-agriculturalresearch.
Google Scholar
28
-
Quisumbing, A.R. and Meinzen-Dick, R. (2001). Empowering Women to Achieve Food Security.
Google Scholar
29
-
FAO. (2010). Smallholder poultry production– livelihoods, food security and socio-cultural significance; by Kryger, K.N., Thomsen, K.A., Whyte, M.A. and Dissing, M. Smallholder Poultry Production; Paper No. 4; Food and Agricultural Organization, FAO:Rome, Italy.
Google Scholar
30
-
Ahlers, C., Alders, R.G., Bagnol, B., Cambaza, A.B., Harun, M.;,Mgomezulu, R., Msami, H., Pym, R., Wegener, P., Wethli, E. and Young, M. Improving village chicken production: a manual for field workers and trainers. In: ACIAR Monograph No. 139; 2009; p.194.
Google Scholar
31
-
Guèye, E.F. (2003). Gender issues in family poultry production systems in low-income food-deficit countries. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 18, 185-195.https://doi.org/10.1079/AJAA200350.
Google Scholar
32
-
Jaitner, J., Sowe, J., Secka-Njie, E. and Dempfl E.L. (2001). Ownership pattern and management practices of small ruminants in The Gambia–implications for a breeding programme. Small Ruminant. Research, 40(2), 101–108.
Google Scholar
33
-
Oluka, J., Owoyesigire, B.; Esenu, B. and Sssewannyana, E. (2005). Small stock and women in livestock production in the Teso Farming System region of Uganda. Small Stock inDevelopment151.
Google Scholar
34
-
Okitoi, L.O., Ondwasy, H.O., Obali, M.P. and Murekefu, F. (2007). Gender issues in poultry production in rural households of western Kenya. Livestock Research for Rural Development19; Article #17 http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/2/okit19017.htm.
Google Scholar
35
-
Mapiye, C.; Mwale, M.; Mupangwa, J.F.; Chimonyo, M.; Foti, R.; Mutenje, M.J. (2008). A research review of village chicken production constraints and opportunities in Zimbabwe. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 21, 1680–1688.https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.r.07.
Google Scholar
36
-
Tadelle, D.; Ogle, B. (2001). Village poultry production system in the central high lands of Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 33, 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012740832558.
Google Scholar
37
-
Kusina, J., Kusina, N. and Mhlanga, J. A survey on village chicken losses: causes and solutions as perceived by farmers. Paper presented at the ACIAR Proceedings, Canberra, Australia, 2001; pp. 148-155.
Google Scholar
38
-
Dolberg, F. Poultry production for livelihood improvement and poverty alleviation. In: Thieme, O.; Pilling, D. (Ed), Poultry in the 21st Century: Avian influenza and beyond. Proceedings of the International Poultry Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, 5-7 November 2007.
Google Scholar
39
-
Muchadeyi, F., Sibanda, S., Kusina, N., Kusina, J. and Makuza, S. (2004). The Village Chicken Production System in Rushinga District of Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 16. http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd16/06/much16040.htm.
Google Scholar
40
-
Alders, R.G. and Pym, R.A.E. (2009). Village poultry: still important to millions, eight thousand years after domestication. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 65(02), 181–190.
Google Scholar
41
-
Guèye, E.F. (2005). Gender aspects in family poultry management systems in developing countries. World's Poultry Science Journal, 61, 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS200440.
Google Scholar
42
-
FAO. (2004). Small‐scale poultry production: technical guide. In FAO animal production and health manual #1; Food and Agriculture Organizationof the United Nations: Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/y5169e/y5169e00.htm.
Google Scholar
43
-
Mason, K. (1998). Wives’ economic decision-making power in the family: five Asian countries. In K. Mason (ed.) The Changing Family in Comparative Perspective: Asia and the United States; East-West Center: Honolulu, USA.
Google Scholar
44
-
Quisumbing, A.R. (2003). What have we learned from research on intra-household allocation? In A. Quisumbing (ed.) Household Decisions, Gender, and Development: ASynthesis of Recent Research; IFPRI: Washington DC, USA.
Google Scholar
45
-
World Bank. (2001). Engendering Development: Through Gender Equality in Rights, Resources, and Voice;World Bank: Washington DC, USA.
Google Scholar
46
-
Wong, J.T., de Bruyn, J., Bagnol, B., Grieve, H., Li, M., Pym, R. and Alders, R.G.(2017). Small-scale poultry in resource-poor settings: a review. Global Food Security, 15, 43-52.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.04.003.
Google Scholar
47
-
Grown, C., Gupta, G.R. and Kes, A. (2005). Taking Action: Achieving Gender Equality and the Millennium Development Goals; Earthscan: London, UK.
Google Scholar
48
-
OECD. (2009). DAC Guiding Principles for Aid Effectiveness, Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment; Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: Paris, France. http://www.oecd.org/social/gender-development/42310124.pdf
Google Scholar
49
-
SDC. (2007). “The Livestock Revolution: An Opportunity for Poor Farmers?” Inforesources Focus No. 1/07, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC): Bern,Switzerland.
Google Scholar
50
-
Upton, M. (2004). “The Role of Livestock in Economic Development and Poverty Reduction;” Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative Working Paper 10; Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy.
Google Scholar
51
-
Fischer, E. and Qaim, M. (2012). Linking smallholders to markets: determinants and impacts of farmer collective action in Kenya. Food Security, 4, 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-012-0199-7.
Google Scholar
52
-
Baden, S. (1998). Gender issues in agricultural liberalization. Topic paper prepared for Directorate General for Development (DGVIII) of the European Commission. Bridge Report No. 41; Institute for Development Studies, Sussex University: Brighton, UK.
Google Scholar
53
-
Dolan, C. 2001. The “good wife”: struggles over resources in the Kenyan horticultural sector. Journal of Development Studies, 37(3), 39–70.
Google Scholar
54
-
World Bank. (2012). World Development Report 2012; Gender Equality and Development; World Bank: Washington DC, USA.
Google Scholar
55
-
Guèye, E.F. (1998). Village egg and fowl meat production in Africa. World's Poultry Science Journal, 54, 73–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/WPS19980007.
Google Scholar
56
-
Aklilu, A.H. (2007). Village Poultry in Ethiopia. Socio-technical analysis and learning with farmers. Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Google Scholar
57
-
Njuki, J. Gender and livestock value chains in Kenya, Tanzania and Mozambique. Paper presented at the Workshop on Gender and Market Oriented Agriculture, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 31 January–2 February 2011.
Google Scholar
58
-
Sally, B. (1998). “Gender Issues in Agricultural Liberalisation;” Topic paper prepared for Directorate General for Development of the European Commission; Report No. 41; Institute of Development Studies: Brighton, UK.
Google Scholar
59
-
Hill, C. (2003). “Livestock and Gender: The Tanzanian Experience in Different Livestock Production Systems; A Glance at LinKS: LinKS Project Case Study No. 3;” FAO: Rome, Italy.
Google Scholar
60
-
Smith, L., Ramakrishnan, U., Ndiaye, A., Haddad, L.J. and Martorell, R. (2003). The Importance of Women’s Status for Child Nutrition in Developing Countries. Research Report 131.
Google Scholar
61
-
KIT; Agri-ProFocus; IIRR. (2012). Challenging Chains to Change: Gender Equity in Agricultural Value Chain Development; KIT Publishers, Royal TropicalInstitute: Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Google Scholar
62
-
Kariuki, J., Njuki, J., Mburu, S. and Waithanji, E. Women, livestock ownership and food security; International Livestock Research Institute and International Development Research Centre: Nairobi, Kenya, 2013, pp. 95.
Google Scholar
63
-
FAO/Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, MARD/Agrifood consulting International, ACI. “Gender Analysis in Poultry Production in ChúcSontown, Chuong My˜ District, HàTây Province and ChàLâ Commune, DuongMinhChàu District, TãyNinh Province.” Power Point presentation at the workshop, The Future of Poultry Farmers in Vietnam after Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza, Hanoi, Vietnam, March 8–9 2007.
Google Scholar
64
-
IFAD. (2007). Innovation in Women's Small-scale Poultry Activities; International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD): Rome, Italy.http://www.ifad.org/gender/learning/sector/agriculture/w_i.htm.
Google Scholar
65
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Md Hakimul Haque,
Md. Mizanur Rahman,
Md. Lovelu Miah,
Soshe Ahmed,
Md. Rabiul Islam Sazib,
Rashida Khaton,
Aurangazeb Kabir,
Md. Nasir Uddin,
Exploring Antibiotic Resistance Pattern of Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., and Staphylococcus spp. Isolated from Eggs in Rajshahi , European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences: Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) -
Aurangazeb Kabir,
Md. Obaidullah Al Masum,
Most. Sabina Yasmin,
Md. Golam Sarwar,
Md. Shamim Hossain,
Md. Emtiaj Alam,
Soshe Ahmed,
Mohammad Mahbubur Rahman,
Investigation on Seroprevalence of Mycoplasma Gallisepticum Infection in Commercial Layer Farms in Rajshahi District Using Rapid Serum Plate Agglutination Test , European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences: Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) -
Rabiul Islam,
Md. Anwarul Haque Beg,
Maksuda Begum,
Md. Zahir Uddin Rubel,
Mst. Mayeeda Parvin,
Effects of Dietary Incorporation of Neem (Azadirachta indica), Moringa (Moringa oleifera), and Jute (Corchorus olitorius) Leaf Powder on Production Performance and Blood Indices of Broiler Chickens as a Substitute of Antibiotic , European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences: Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024) -
Aurangazeb Kabir,
Most. Sabina Yasmin,
Md. Golam Sarwar,
Md. Obaidullah Al Masum,
Soshe Ahmed,
Mohammad Mahbubur Rahman,
Evaluation of Antibiotic Sensitivity Against Bacterial Diseases Prevalent in Commercial Poultry Farm in Western Part of Bangladesh , European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences: Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021) -
Deabasish Barman,
Sumon Sarkar,
Mst. Misrat Masuma Parvez,
Md. Mahmudul Hasan,
Fahima Binthe Aziz,
Rakibul Islam,
Soshe Ahmed,
Md Hakimul Haque,
Md. Bazlar Rashid,
Anti-prolactin Agent with Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Synergistically Improve Egg Production in Indigenous Chicken via Regulating Broody Behavior , European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences: Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022) -
Md. Anwarul H. Beg,
Maksuda Begum,
Maniruzaman,
Md. Zahir U. Rubel,
Maximizing Performance with Safe Meat Production of Broiler by Feeding Enzyme Supplemented Antibiotic Free Diet , European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences: Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) -
Selina Azmir Tumpa,
Maksuda Begum,
Tayeaba Jannat,
Md. Elias Hossain,
Comparison of Different Antibiotic Alternatives for Safe Broiler Production , European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences: Vol. 6 No. 6 (2024) -
Maksuda Begum,
Md. Moniruzzaman Mim,
Mah Beg,
Shukla Sikder,
Akhil Chandra,
Saju Islam,
Cost-Effective Production of Safe Quail Egg with Medicinal Plant as an Alternative to Antibiotics , European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences: Vol. 6 No. 6 (2024)