Maximizing Performance with Safe Meat Production of Broiler by Feeding Enzyme Supplemented Antibiotic Free Diet



Abstract Views
243

Downloads
62

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Nov 16, 2021
Published Aug 21, 2022
10.24018/ejfood.2022.4.4.417

Abstract viewed = 243 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The present work aimed at studying growth performance, carcass traits, and health status in broiler chicken-fed enzyme over a period of 4 weeks. A total of 300 day-old Lohmann broilers were randomly assigned to five treatment groups, each with 3 replicates (20). T1, T2, and T3 were provided as 0.05 %, 0.1 %, and 0.15 % of the enzyme. Whereas T4 and T5 were antibiotic and control, respectively. The results revealed no significant (P<0.05) difference in feed intake (T4 - 2182.50bg and T2 - 2227.00 abg) and live weight (T5 - 1897.50a g and T1 - 1790.50b). The highest survivability percent was found in the enzyme supplemented group (T1, T2 &T3- 100 %). Highest hemoglobin (T2 - 9.0 gm/dl), RBC (T2-3.9mill/cum), WBC (T1-14475 mill/cum), lymphocytes (T1 - 38.50 %), Monocytes (T1 - 2.00 %) PCV (39.96 %), MCV (T1 - 88.58), MCH (T2 - 30.85 Pg) and MCHC (T2 - 32.80) were found highest in the enzyme-treated groups, which is an indication of good health. E. coli and salmonella spp. The count was significantly (P<0.05) lower in birds fed a 0.15 % enzyme supplemented diet and with a descending order of 0.1 % and 0.5 % enzyme level. Salmonella sp. and E Coli count was also significantly (p<0.05) higher in birds fed control and antibiotic. The results of the study demonstrate the beneficial effects of supplementing enzymes on body weight gain and dressed yield in the treated groups in broiler chicken. An enzyme is, therefore, suggested to be used as an alternative to antibiotics on broiler chicken rations for higher profitability.

Keywords: Broiler, Enzyme, Safe Broiler, Microbiome, Gut Health.

References

  1. Diarra MS, Rempel H, Champagne J, Masson L, Pritchard J, Topp E. Distribution of antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes in enterococcus spp. and characterization of isolates from broiler chickens, Appl Environ Microbiol, 2010; 76: 8033-8043.
     Google Scholar
  2. Forgetta V, Rempel H, Malouin F, Vaillancourt R, Topp E, Dewar K, et al. Pathogenic and multidrug-resistant Escherichia fergusonii from broiler chicken. Poult Sci, 2012; 91: 512-525.
     Google Scholar
  3. Furtula V, Farrell EG, Diarrassouba F, Rempel H, Pritchard J, Diarra MS, et al. Veterinary pharmaceuticals and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia Coli isolates in poultry litter from commercial farms and controlled feeding trials. Poult Sci, 2010; 89: 180-188.
     Google Scholar
  4. Carvalho T, Santos L. Antibiotics in the aquatic environments: A review of the European scenario. Environ Int, 2016; 94: 736-757.
     Google Scholar
  5. Gonzalez M, Ronquillo JC, Hernandez A. Antibiotic and synthetic growth promoters in animal diets: A review of impact and analytical method. Food Contr, 2017; 72: 255-267.
     Google Scholar
  6. Diarra MS, Rempel H, Champagne J, Masson L, Pritchard J, Topp E. Distribution of antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes in enterococcus spp. and characterization of isolates from broiler chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2010; 76: 8033-8043.
     Google Scholar
  7. Adeola O, Cowieson, AJ. Board-invited review: opportunities and challenges in using exogenous enzymes to improve nonruminant animal production. J. Anim. Sci. 2011; 89: 3189–3218. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010.
     Google Scholar
  8. Bedford MR, Cowieson AJ. Exogenous enzymes and their effects on intestinal microbiology. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2012, 173: 76-85.
     Google Scholar
  9. Bergh MO, Razdan A, Aman P. Nutritional influence of broiler chicken diets based on covered normal, waxy and high amylose barleys with or without enzyme supplementation. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 1999; 78(3-4): 215-226.
     Google Scholar
  10. Cmiljanić R, Sretenovič LI, Trenkovski S, Marinkov G. Systems of poultry nutrition and their effect on production traits and quality of product. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 2001; 17(5-6): 179-185.
     Google Scholar
  11. McNab JM, Bernard K. The effect of proteases on the true metabolisable energy and true digestibility of amino acids in soybean meal. Poultry Science, 1997; 76: 133 (Abst.).
     Google Scholar
  12. Perić l, Kovčin S, Stanaćev V, Milošević N. Effect of enzymes on broiler chick performance. Buletinul USAMV 2001; 57: 245-249.
     Google Scholar
  13. Khumalo K, Paul A, Slippers S, Gous RM. Intestinal function and body growth of broiler chickens on diets based on maize at different temperatures and supplemented with a microbial enzyme. Repr. Nutr. Dev., 2003; 43: 77-90.
     Google Scholar
  14. Acamovic T. Enzymes for poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 2001; 57: 225-242.
     Google Scholar
  15. Kang P, Hou YQ, Toms D, Yan ND, Ding BY, Gong J. Effects of enzyme complex supplementation to a paddy-based diet on performance and nutrient digestibility of meat-type ducks. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2013; 26 : 253-259.
     Google Scholar
  16. Rutherfurd SM, Chung TK, Thomas DV. Effect of a novel phytase on growth performance, apparent metabolizable energy, and the availability of minerals and amino acids in a low-phosphorus corn-soybean meal diet for broilers. Poultry Science, 2012; 91: 1118-1127.
     Google Scholar
  17. Cowieson AJ, Acamovic T, Bedford MR. Enzyme supplementation of diets containing Camelia sativa meal for poultry. British Poultry Science, 2000; 41: 689-690.
     Google Scholar
  18. Cmiljanić R, Sretenovič LI, Trenkovski S, Marinkov G. Systems of poultry nutrition and their effect on production traits and quality of product. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 2001; 17(5-6): 179-185.
     Google Scholar
  19. Mcnab JM, Bernard K. The effect of proteases (Vegpro) on the true metabolisable energy (TMEn) and true digestibility of amino acids in soybean meal. Poultry Science, 1997; 76: 133 (Abst.).
     Google Scholar
  20. Acamovic T. Enzymes for poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 2001; 57: 225-242.
     Google Scholar
  21. Cowieson AJ, Adeola O. Carbohydrase, protease, and phytase have an additive beneficial effect in nutritionally marginal diets for broilers chicks. Poultry Science, 2005; 84:1860-1867.
     Google Scholar
  22. Francesch M, Geraert PA. Enzyme complex containing carbohydrases and phytase improve growth performance and bone mineralization of broilers fed reduced nutrient corn-soybean-based diets. Poultry Science, 2009; 88: 1915-1924.
     Google Scholar
  23. Adedokun LH, Preynat SA, Legrand A, Defretin V, Geraert PA, Adeola O, et al. Impact of exogenous carbohydrases and phytase on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in broilers. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 2013; 93(2): 243-249.
     Google Scholar
  24. Akyurek H, Ozduven ML, Okur AA. The effect of supplementing an organic acid blend and/or microbial phytase to a corn-soybean based diet fed to broiler chickens. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2011; 6: 642-649.
     Google Scholar
  25. Lima FR. Aditivos zootécnicos: enzimas.In: Palermo Neto J, Spinosa HS, Górniak Sl. Farmacologia aplicada à avicultura. São Paulo: ROCA; 2005; 239-248.
     Google Scholar
  26. Maenz DD, Engele, Schaan CM, Newkirk RW, Classen HL. The effect of minerals and mineral chelators on the formation of phytase-resistant and phytase-susceptible forms of phytic acid in solution and in a slurry of canola meal. Animal Feed Science and Technology,1991; 81: 177-192.
     Google Scholar
  27. Attia YA, Addeo NF, Al-Hamid AE, Al-Hamid A, Bovera F. Effects of Phytase Supplementation to Diets with or without Zinc Addition on Growth Performance and Zinc Utilization of White Pekin Ducks. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(5): 280.
     Google Scholar
  28. Baloch F, Baloch H, Khan A, Baloch N, Baloch I, Baloch N, Qambrani A, Samejo A. Effect of Phytase Enzyme on Organs Growth Performance and Blood Profile of Broiler. Advances in Enzyme Research, 2021; 9: 37-49. DOI: 10.4236/aer.93004.
     Google Scholar
  29. Simons PCM, Versteegh HAJ, Jongbloed AW, Kemme PA, Slump P, Bos KD, Wolters MGE, Beudeker RF, Verschoor GJ. Improvement of phosphorus availability by microbial phytase in broilers and pigs. Br. J. Nutr. 1990; 64: 525–540.
     Google Scholar
  30. Biehl RR, Baker DH, DeLuca HF. 1α-hydroxylated cholecalciferol compounds act additively with microbial phytase to improve phosphorus, zinc and manganese utilization in chicks fed soy-based diet. J. Nutr. 1995; 125: 2407–2416.
     Google Scholar
  31. Denbow DM, Ravindran V, Kornegay ET, Yi Z, Hulet HM. Improving phosphorus availability in soybean meal for broilers by supplemental phytase. Poultry Sci. 1995; 74: 1831–1842.
     Google Scholar
  32. Kornegay ET, Denbow DM. Effect of microbial phytase on nitrogen and amino acid digestibility. Poultry Science, 1996; 75: 979-990.
     Google Scholar