Tanzania Livestock Research Institute, Tanzania
* Corresponding author
Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania

Article Main Content

A study was carried out to assess status and preference of smallholder dairy farmers on breeding method use under smallholder dairy cattle production in Southern Highland zone of Tanzania. Three districts namely Njombe, Mbeya and Mbozi were purposively selected for data collection. Data were collected using a questionnaire. A total of 180 dairy farmers in three districts were voluntary interviewed. Results showed that many of dairy farmers’ age range between 41 to 50 years (33%) of respondents, 48% of respondents (48.9%) had primary education, many farmers were found not to be working in groups (82.2%) and majority had never received any training on dairy husbandry (81.1%).

Zero grazing was the main management system (97.2%) used by farmers in all districts. Cows’ sheds were partially roofed, and the floors were soiled (48.9%). Mean dairy herd size was 5.21 per household and natural service was the predominant breeding method (55%) under smallholder farms production system. Farmers’ main reason for using AI was to improve genetic potential of their animal (48.8%). Under this system the major challenges of AI service were inefficient semen supply and poor heat detection. Natural services are widely used since it is easily accessible and cheaper. It therefore concluded that use of natural service is still a predominant method of choice in breeding due to unreliability and inefficiency associated with AI service in the Southern Highland zone of Tanzania.

References

  1. Lopez H, Satter L and Wiltbank M. Relationship between the level of milk production and oestrous behaviour of lactating dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science, 2004; 81: 209-223.
     Google Scholar
  2. Njombe AP, Msanga YN, Temba AE and Tsoxo M. Efforts to increase dairy cattle in Tanzania. Ministry of livestock and fisheries development. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania 2008, site visited 18/12/2021 from http://www.mifugo.go.tz/.
     Google Scholar
  3. Hossain MM, Alam M, Rashid MM, Asaduzzaman M. and Rahman MM. Small scale dairy farming practice in a selected area of Bangladesh. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 2005; 4 (4): 215-221.
     Google Scholar
  4. Uddin MN, Uddin MB, Al Mamun M, Hassan MM and Khan MMH. Small scale dairy farming for livelihoods of rural farmers: Constraints and prospects in Bangladesh. Journal of Animal Science Advances, 2012; 2 (6): 543-550.
     Google Scholar
  5. Mwambene PL, Katule AM, Chenyambuga SW and Mwakilembe PAA. Fipa cattle in the southwestern highlands of Tanzania: socio-economic roles, traditional management practices and production constraints. Journal of Animal Genetic Resources, (FAO), 2012;51:1–14. DOI:http://dx.do.org/10.1017/ s2078633612000112.
     Google Scholar
  6. Asimwe L. Factors influencing breeding and reproductive efficiency in smallholder dairy cattle in Tanzania: A case study of Turiani Division and Bukoba district. M.Sc. Thesis Sokoine University of Agriculture Morogoro, Tanzania 2004; 80 pp.
     Google Scholar
  7. World Bank. Strengthening agricultural extensions and advisory system: Procedures for assessing, transforming and evaluating extension systems. Agriculture and Rural Development, 2010;44:81–85.
     Google Scholar
  8. Yeamkongo S, Koonawoortrittriron S, Elzo M and Suwanasopee T. Effect of experience, education, record keeping, labour and decision making on monthly milk yield and revenue of dairy farms supported by private organization in Central Thailand. Australiasian Journal of Animal Science, 2010; 23(6): 814-824.
     Google Scholar
  9. Gillah K A, Kifaro GC and Madsen JA description of management and production levels of cross bred dairy cattle in Dar es Salaam and Morogoro urban and peri urban areas. Academia Journal of Agricultural Research, 2013;1(8):131-144, visited 10/12/2021 from http://dx.doi.org/10.15413/ajar.2013.0107.
     Google Scholar
  10. Kassa TM. A study on urban agriculture: the case of small-scale urban dairy farming in selected areas of Addis Ababa, M. A thesis presented to the school of graduate studies of the Addis Ababa University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of M.A. in Geography 2003;pp.175-177.
     Google Scholar
  11. FAO. Farm structure in tropical climates: A Textbook for structural engineering and design. Bengtsson, L.P. and Whitaker, J.H. (Editors). FAO/SIDA Cooperative Programme. Rural Structures in East and South-East Africa 1998; pp 167 from http://www.fao.org/d/s1250e/S1250E00.htm.
     Google Scholar
  12. Kivaria FM, Noordhuizen JPTM and Kapaga AM. Prospects and Constraints of Smallholder Dairy Husbandry in Dar es Salaam Region, Tanzania. Outlook on Agriculture, 2006; 35(3): 209-215.
     Google Scholar
  13. Ibrahim MNM and Zemmelink GA. Comparative evaluation of integrated farm models with the village situation in the Forest-Garden area of Kandy, Sri Lanka. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2000; 13(1):53-59.
     Google Scholar
  14. Hafez ESE, and Hafez B. Reproduction in Farm Animals (7th edition). Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, USA.2000; 510 pp.
     Google Scholar
  15. Njarui DMG, Gatheru M, Wambua JM, Nguluu S N, Mwangi DM and Keya GA. Dairy cattle value chain assessment: Characterisation of milk production in semi-arid Kenya. Working document, Kenya Arid and Semi-arid Land Programme (KASAL) 2009; 77pp.
     Google Scholar
  16. Gaines JD. Investigating sub fertile dairy herds: three case histories, Veterinary Medicine, 1990;85: 409-517.
     Google Scholar
  17. Mekonnen T, Bekana M and Abayneh T.Reproductive performance and efficiency of artificial insemination in smallholder dairy cows/heifers in and around Arsi-Negelle,Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 2010; from http://www.Irrd.org/Irrd22/3.
     Google Scholar
  18. Gillah KA, Kifaro GC and Madsen J. Urban and peri urban dairy farming in East Africa: A review on production levels, constraints and opportunities. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 2012;24:198. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/11/gill24198.htm.
     Google Scholar
  19. Mungube EO, Njarui DMG, Gatheru M, Kabirizi J and Ndikumana J. Reproductive and health constraints of dairy cattle in the peri-urban areas of semi-arid eastern Kenya. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 2014; http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd26/6/mung26098.htm.
     Google Scholar
  20. Msanga YN, Bryant M J and Katule AM. Effect of environmental factors and proportions of Holstein blood on days to first insemination and calving interval of crossbred dairy cattle on smallholder farmers in Northeast Tanzania. In: Proceedings of the Tanzania Society of Animal Production. Arusha, Tanzania. 1999; pp. 161-175.
     Google Scholar
  21. Salem B, Djemali M, Kayouli C and Majdoub A. A review of environmental and management factors affecting the reproductive performance of Holstein-Friesian dairy herds in Tunisia. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 2006. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd18/4/sale1 8053.htm.
     Google Scholar
  22. Kastelic J. Computerized Estrus Detection Western Canadian Dairy Seminar March 12, WCDS Proceedings 2001. http://www.wcds.Afns.ualberta.ca/Proceedings/2001/Chapter%2030%20Kasteli.
     Google Scholar
  23. Nebel RL. Components of a successful heat detection program 2003; Advanced documents storage/Dairy%20/ Sumbawanga%20final.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  24. Favley L and Chantalakhana C. Smallholder dairying in the tropics International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya. 2009; 462pp.
     Google Scholar
  25. Britt JH, Schott RG, Armstrong JD and Whitacre MD. Determinants of estrous behavior in lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 1986;69:2195-2202.
     Google Scholar
  26. Borsberry S and Dobson H. Periparturient diseases and their effect on Reproductive performance in five dairy herds. Veterinaly Record, 1989;124:217-219.
     Google Scholar
  27. Dobson H and Smith RF. What is stress, and how does it affect reproduction. Animal Reproduction Science, 2000;60:743–752.
     Google Scholar
  28. Wolfenson D, Roth Z and Meidan R. Impaired reproduction in heat stressed cattle: basic and applied aspects. Dairy Animal Reproduction Science, 2000;60:535-547.
     Google Scholar
  29. Stevenson JS. Reproductive management of dairy cows in high milk-producing herds. Journal of Dairy Science, 2001;84: E128-E143.
     Google Scholar
  30. Issuja RJ.The influence of artificial Insemination on reproductive performance of dairy cows in selected farms. Dissertation for Award of MSc Degree at Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania, 2012; pp 60 pp.
     Google Scholar
  31. Pursley JR. Strategies and rationale for resynchronization of ovulation in lactating dairy cows. In: Proceedings of Dairy Cattle Reproduction Council Annual Meeting, Denver CO, 2007; pp. 37-43.
     Google Scholar
  32. Looper M.When should the cow be inseminated? College of Agriculture and Home Economics.2000; http://www.thedairysite.com/…/when-should-dairy-cows-be-inseminated.
     Google Scholar
  33. Dalton JC, Nadir S, Bame JH, Noft singer M, Nebel RL and Saacke RG. Effect of time of insemination on number of accessory sperm, fertilization rate, and embryo quality in non-lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 2001; 84:2413-2418.
     Google Scholar
  34. Pursley JR, Silcox RW and Wiltbank MC.Effect of time of artificial insemination on pregnancy rates, calving rates, pregnancy loss, and gender ratio after synchronization of ovulation in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 1998;81(8): 2139-2144.
     Google Scholar
  35. Mugisha A, Kayiizi V, Owiny D and Mburu J. Breeding Services and the factors influencing their use on smallholder dairy farms in central Uganda. Veterinary Medicine International, 2014;6 pp.
     Google Scholar
  36. Peralta OA, Pearson RE and Nebel RL. Comparison of three estrus detection systems during summer in a large commercial dairy herd. Animal Reproduction Science, 2005; 87: 59-72.
     Google Scholar
  37. Rodriguez-Martinez H. Assisted reproductive techniques for cattle breeding in developing countries: a critical appraisal of their value and limitations. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 2012;47:21-26.
     Google Scholar
  38. Van Vleck LD (eds.). Potential genetic impact of artificial insemination, sex selection, embryo transfer, cloning and selfing in dairy cattle. In: Brackett BG, Seidel GE, Siedel SM. New Technologies in Animal Breeding, New York, USA, Academic Press. 1981; pp. 221-242.
     Google Scholar
  39. Mureda E and Zeleke Z. Characteristics and constraints of crossbred dairy cattle production in lowland areas of Eastern Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 2008;20:57.
     Google Scholar
  40. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/4/mure20057.htm.
     Google Scholar
  41. Msanga BSJ, Bryant MJ, Thorne PJ. Some factors affecting variation in milk yield in crossbred dairy cows on smallholder farms in North-east Tanzania. Tropical Animal Health Production, 2005;37: 403-412.
     Google Scholar
  42. Muriuki HG. Dairy development in Kenya. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Dairy report, 2011:52-60.
     Google Scholar
  43. Swai ES, Kyakaisho P and Ole-Kawanara MS. Studies on the reproductive performance of crossbred dairy cows raised on smallholder farms in eastern Usambara Mountains, Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 2007;19:61. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/5/swai19061.htm.
     Google Scholar
  44. Desalegn G and Medhin. Performance of artificial insemination: challenges and opportunities in Ethiopian meat and dairy technology institute workshop on “alternatives for improving field AI delivery system” [ilri/ipms] 2011.
     Google Scholar