Research Article

Business Viability of Small Combine Harvester in Haor Areas

AKM Saiful Islam
Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Bangladesh
Md. Ashraful Alam
Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Bangladesh
* Corresponding author
M. Kamruzzaman
Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Bangladesh
Md. Golam Kibria Bhuiyan
Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Bangladesh
Md. Monirul Islam
Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Bangladesh
Mohammad Rezoan Bin Hafiz Pranto
Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Bangladesh
DOI icon 10.24018/ejfood.2021.3.3.290

Read Counter
1247

Downloads
573

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2021-04-25
Published 2021-05-17

Read counter = 1247 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

Haor areas are the most vulnerable areas in Bangladesh. Rice is the major food crops grown in the hoar areas despite natural threats during the harvesting period. The appropriate size of the mechanical harvester is one of the solutions to mitigate the natural calamities and labor shortage in the hoar regions. This paper examines the technical and financial performance of a small combine harvester with the aim of determining its market viability in Bangladesh's hoar areas. Based on the field test and economic assessment, data on field power, forward speed, fuel consumption, time allocation in harvesting, hire fee, and payback period of machine were determined. The study showed that the operation by width was 10% less than the operation by longitudinal. Plot length and area of the plot should be more than 25m and 400 m2, respectively, to operate the small combine harvester at full capacity. Harvesting speed ranged from 0.63-0.90 km hr-1, and actual field capacity ranged from 0.03-0.05 ha hr-1. Fuel consumption ranged from 25-32 L ha-1 due to slow cutting speed. The plant density was observed higher due to cultivating high yielding variety. The machine should be operated at a low speed, preferably walking speed, to avoid clogging in the conveying chain. The combine harvester has used 56% of the harvest time, and a remaining 44% for turning purposes and other inevitable uses. The small combine harvester recorded 1.12-1.40% loss of grain. However, grain damaged was not observed during harvesting. The small combine harvester becomes profitable for the investment cost of Tk 3,50,000 with a hiring rate of Tk 10,000 Tk ha-1 following 15 ha of harvesting area in a harvest capability of 0.04 ha hr-1. This machine is suitable for a small size of land where larger sizes of machines are inaccessible. This would offer small entrepreneur different choices of paddy harvesting mechanization to encourage future adoption of enhanced innovations.

Keywords: Entrepreneur, harvesting speed, field capacity, hiring charge

References

  1. A. K. M. S. Islam, “Rice mechanization in Bangladesh”, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur, Bangladesh, Publication number 260, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  2. A. K. M. S. Islam, M. A. Rahman, A. K. M. L. Rahman, M. T. Islam, and M. I. Rahman, “Techno-economic performance of 4-row self-propelled mechanical rice transplanter at farmers’ field in Bangladesh”, Progressive Agriculture, vol. 27, pp. 369-382, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  3. A. K. M. S. Islam, M. G. K. Bhuiyan, M. Kamruzzaman, M. A. Alam, and M. A. Rahman, “Custom hire service business of rice combine harvester in haor basin of Bangladesh”., Bangladesh Rice J, vol. 23, pp. 65-75, 2019.
     Google Scholar
  4. A. K. M. S. Islam, M. T. Islam, M. A. Rabbani, M. A. Rahman, and A. B. M. Z. Rahman, “Commercial mechanical rice transplanting under public private partnership in Bangladesh”, Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, vol. 06, pp. 501-511, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  5. A. Muazu, A. Yahya, W. I. W. Ishak, and S. Khairunniza-Bejo, “Machinery utilization and production cost of wetland, direct seeding paddy cultivation in Malaysia”, Agric Agric Sci Procedia, vol. 2, pp. 361–369, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  6. A. R. Tahir, H. K. Faizan, and K. Ejaz, “Techno-economic feasibility of combine harvester (Class Denominator)-A Case Study”, International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, vol. 5, pp. 57-60, 2003.
     Google Scholar
  7. A. W. Anderson, “Factors affecting machinery costs in grain production”, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Paper No. 88-1057, 1988.
     Google Scholar
  8. ASAE Standards, “agricultural machinery management data”, ASAE D497.4 Science, 85 (2210), 350e357, 2009.
     Google Scholar
  9. C. A. Rotz, G. W. Roth, K. J. Soder, and R. R. Schnabel, “Economic and Environmental Implications of Soybean Production and Use on Pennsylvania Dairy Farms”, Agronomy Journal, vol. 93, pp. 418-428, 2001.
     Google Scholar
  10. D. Hunt, “Farm Power and Machinery Management”, 10th edition, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA, 2001.
     Google Scholar
  11. D. Hunt, “Farm Power and Machinery Management”, Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA, 1995.
     Google Scholar
  12. D. Kehayov, C. Vezirov, and A. Atanasov, “Some technical aspects of cut height in wheat harvest”, Agronomy Research, vol. 2, pp. 181-186, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  13. D. R. Buckmaster, “Benchmarking tractor costs; a technical note”, Applied Engineering in Agriculture, vol. 19, pp. 151–154, 2003.
     Google Scholar
  14. F. Henrichsmeyer, J. Ohls, and K. Winter, “Leistung und Kosten von Arbeitsverfahren in Grossbetrieben (Work requirement and costs on large farms)”, Landtechnik, vol. 50, pp. 296-297, 1995.
     Google Scholar
  15. H. Sharanakumar , R. U. Udhaykumar, and K. T. Ramappa, “Techno-economic feasibility of rice combine harvester”, Journal of Engineering and Technology in India, vol. 2, pp. 13-17, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  16. J. Masek, P. Novak, and T. Pavlicek, “Evaluation of combine harvester fuel consumption and operation cost”, Engineering for Rural Development, Jelgava, vol. 5, pp. 78-83, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  17. J. Soucek, and D. Blazej, “Linseed harvests parameters depending on the state of cutting mechanism”, Research in Agricultural Engineering, vol. 58, pp. 46–49, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  18. L. A. Yousif, and S. E. A. E. Awad, “Performance evaluation of combine harvester and the P.T.O. tractor operated thresher for stationary threshing of sorghum”, Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America, vol. 43, pp. 52-56, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  19. L. Spokas, and D. Steponavicius, “Fuel consumption during cereal and rape harvesting and methods of its reduction”, Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, vol. 9, pp. 257-263, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  20. L. Spokas, V. Adamcuk, V. Bulgakov, and L. Nozdrovicky, “The experimental research of combine harvesters”, Research in Agricultural Engineering, vol. 62, pp. 106-112, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  21. L. William, “Farm Machinery Economic Cost Estimates”, Extension Farm Management Specialist, Nebraska University, USA, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  22. M. A. Hossain, M. A. Hoque, M. A. Wohab, M. A. Miah, and M. S. Hassan, “Technical and economic performance of combine harvester in farmers' field”, Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 40, pp. 291-304, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  23. M. A. S. Mandal, M. J. Kabir, M. S. Kabir, M. A. Salam, M. A. Islam, M. I. Omar, M. A. R. Sarkar, M. C. Rahman, A. Chowdhury, M. S. Rahaman, L. Deb, M. A. Aziz, and M. A. B. Siddique, “Harvesting of Boro Paddy in Haor Areas of Bangladesh: Interplay of Local and Migrant Labour, Mechanized Harvesters and Covid-19 Vigilance in 2020”, 40 pages, BRRI, Gazipur, Bangladesh, 2020. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342530055_Harvesting_of_Boro_Paddy_in_Haor_Areas_of_Bangladesh_Interplay_of_Local_and_Migrant_Labour_Mechanized_Harvesters_and_Covid-19_Vigilance_in_2020.
     Google Scholar
  24. M. G. K. Bhuiyan, A. K. M. S. Islam, M. Kamruzzaman, M. A. Alam, H. Paul, and M. M. Islam, “Opportunity of local service provider on custom hiring business of combine harvester for small holder farmers’ in haor areas”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, Institute of Engineers, Bangladesh, vol. 43, pp. 85-94, 2020.
     Google Scholar
  25. M. K. Hasan, M. R. Ali, C. K. Saha, M. M. Alam, and M. M. Hossain, “Assessment of paddy harvesting practices of Southern Delta Region in Bangladesh”, Progressive Agriculture, vol. 30, pp. 57-64, 2019.
     Google Scholar
  26. M. Kavka, M. Mimra, and F. Kumhala, “Sensitivity analysis of key operating parameters of combine harvesters”, Research in Agricultural Engineering, vol. 62, pp. 113-121, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  27. M. R. Alizadeh, and A. Allameh, “2013. Evaluating rice losses in various harvesting practices”, Int Res J Appl Basic Sci, vol. 4, pp. 894–901, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  28. N. E. Isaac, G. R. Quick, S. J. Birrell, W. M. Edwards, and B. A. Coers, “Combine harvester economic model with forward speed optimization”, Applied Engineering in Agriculture, vol. 22, pp. 25- 31, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  29. R. A. Kepner, R. Bainer, and E. L. Barger, “Principles of Farm Machinery”, 3rd edition, AVI Publishing Company, Inc, West Port Connecticut, USA, 1982.
     Google Scholar
  30. Sazzad, “Field performance of DAEDONG combine harvester”, MS thesis, Department of Farm Power and Machinery, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  31. S. K. Amponsah, A. Addo, K. A. Dzisi, J. Moreira, and S. A. Ndindeng, “Performance evaluation and field characterization of the sifang mini rice combine harvester”, Applied Engineering in Agriculture, vol. 33, pp. 479-489, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  32. V. Tymchuk, V. Kirichenko, and V. Petrenkova, “Impact of Agricultural Transition on Soil Protection in Ukraine: The Role of Institutional Change. Bondarenko E. Recommendations for harvesting early cereals and legumes”, Agronomy Today, Available online: http://agrobusiness.com.ua/agro/ahronomiia-sohodni/item/ 582-rekomendatsii-do-zbyrannia-rannikhzernovykh-ta-zernobobovykh.html. 2015.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)