Research Article

Management Systems and Productivity of Indigenous Chickens in Busokelo District, Mbeya Region, Tanzania

Grace E. Ngogo
Busokelo District Council, Tanzania
* Corresponding author
Fadhili S. Guni
Tanzania Livestock Research Institute, Tanzania
Athumani S. Nguluma
Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania
DOI icon 10.24018/ejfood.2023.5.1.629

Read Counter
942

Downloads
629

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2022-12-26
Published 2023-02-07

Read counter = 942 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

A study was conducted in Busokelo district, Mbeya region to assess the management systems and productivity of indigenous chickens under village management conditions. A total of 90 respondents from three purposively selected wards were involved in the study. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and data collected included household characteristics and those related to chicken management practices including selection, housing, feeding, culling practices, marketing of chickens, diseases, and health care practices. Other information collected was the productive and reproductive traits of chickens. Data was entered into excel and analysis was carried out using SAS software [1]. The average chicken flock size was 29.88 with the flock dominated by chicks and few cocks. The majority of farmers were raising the chicken in scavenging (55.6%) and semi-intensive (40%) systems. More than half of the respondents reported practicing supplementation, providing drinking water, housing, and treating birds when they are sick. The average age at sexual maturity for male and female chickens was 6.93 and 7.24 months respectively. Clutch size per hen, hatchability, survivability, and annual egg production per hen per year was 14.4 eggs, 83.71%, 55.64%, and 46.6 eggs respectively. Indigenous chicken production in Busokelo district is largely practiced in small-scale semi-intensive and free-range systems with a reasonably good rate of adoption of good management practices such as supplementation, provision of housing, drinking water, and healthcare. The productive and reproductive performance of the chicken is within the range reported for most other indigenous chickens in Africa. However, chick mortality was observed to be very high due to diseases and predation. Improvement in management of chickens, especially young chicks is recommended to increase flock size and reduce loss due to high mortality.

Keywords: clutch size hatchability management systems marketing, mature age

References

  1. SAS. Statistical Analytical System. User guide for personal computers, statistical program. Windows Version 9.2, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA. 2009.
     Google Scholar
  2. Gueye E F. Poultry plays an important role in African village life. World Poultry. 1998; 14(10):14–7.
     Google Scholar
  3. Branckaert R and Guèye E. FAO’s program for support to family poultry production. In: Poultry as a Tool in Poverty Eradication and Promotion of Gender Equality, Proceedings of a Workshop, 1999. http://www.husdyr.kvl.dk/ htm/php/tune99/24-Branckaert.htm.
     Google Scholar
  4. Sonaiya E B. Toward sustainable poultry production in Africa. Paper presented at the FAO expert consultation on strategies for sustainable animal agriculture in developing countries, Rome, 1990.
     Google Scholar
  5. Robert J A. The scavenging feed resource base in assessment of the productivity of scavenging chickens. Newcastle disease in village chickens, control with thermo stable vaccine. In: Proceedings of ACIAR, No. 39, Canberra, Australia. pp. 29-32, 1992.
     Google Scholar
  6. Sonaiya E B and Swan S E J. Small-scale poultry production, technical guide manual. FAO Animal Production and Health 1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  7. Swai E S, Karimuribo E D, Kyakaisho P F and Mtui P F. Free-range village chickens on the humid coastal belt of Tanga, Tanzania: their roles, husbandry, and health status. Livestock Research for Rural Development 2007; 19(8). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/8/ swai19104.htm.
     Google Scholar
  8. Kabatange M. A., and Katule A. M. Rural poultry production systems in Tanzania. Proceedings of an International Workshop on Rural Poultry in Africa. Nigeria 13–16 November 1989. Ile-Ife: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations Rome; p. 171–6, 1998.
     Google Scholar
  9. Lweramila J, Kifaro G C, Gwakisa P S. On-station and on-farm evaluation of two Tanzania chicken ecotypes for body weights at different ages and for egg production. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2008; 3(12):843–51.
     Google Scholar
  10. Mlozi M R S, Kakengi A V M, Minga U M, Mtambo A M and Olsen J E. Marketing of free-range local chicken in Morogoro and Kilosa urban markets, Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development 2003; 15(2). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd15/2/mloz152.htm
     Google Scholar
  11. Pedersen C V. Production of semi-scavenging chickens in Zimbabwe Ph. D Thesis. Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2002.
     Google Scholar
  12. Hellin J, Griffith A and Mike A. Mapping the market: Market-literacy for agricultural research & policy to tackle rural poverty in Africa. In: Proceedings of an International Seminar, 28th February 1st March 2005, Westminster, London, UK, 110-150, 2005.
     Google Scholar
  13. United Republic of Tanzania (URT). Mbeya region socio-economic profile, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  14. Alemayehu T, Bruno J, Poole J, Getachew F. Goromela E, Mbaga S and Dessie T. Household baseline data in Tanzania: Monitoring delivery of chicken genetic gains. ILRI Research Report 49. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), 2018.
     Google Scholar
  15. Biratu D T. Assessment of chicken production and productive performance in Pawe District, Beneshangul Gumuz Regional State, Ethiopia. American Journal of Management Science and Engineering 2021;6(1):1–10. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmse.20210601.11.
     Google Scholar
  16. Ngongolo K, Kitojo O and Chota A. Social–economic impact of chicken production on resource–constrained communities in Dodoma, Tanzania. Poultry Science 2021; 100(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. psj.2020.12.019.
     Google Scholar
  17. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Adult and youth literacy. UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) Fact Sheet No. 20, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  18. Marwa L J, Mbaga S H, Mutayoba S K and Lukuyu B. The productivity and management systems of free-range local chickens in rural areas of Babati District, Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development 2018; 30(134). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd30/8/leon30134.html.
     Google Scholar
  19. Ngongolo K and Chota A. Chicken production, flock size, management systems, and challenges in the Dodoma region in Tanzania. Poultry Science 2021; 100:101136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101136.
     Google Scholar
  20. Justus O, Owuor G and Bebe B O. Management practices and challenges in smallholder indigenous chicken production in Western Kenya. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics 2013; 114: 51–58.
     Google Scholar
  21. Mwalusanya N A, Katule A M, Mutayoba S K and Mtambo M M A. Productivity of local chickens under village management conditions. Tropical Animal Health and Production 2002; 34: 405–416.
     Google Scholar
  22. Wilson C W, Slingerland M, Oosting S, Baijukya F P, Anne-Jo S and Giller K E. The diversity of smallholder chicken farming in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania reveals a range of underlying production constraints, Poultry Science 2022; 101(10): 102062. ISSN 0032–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102062.
     Google Scholar
  23. Okeno T O, Kahi A K and Peters K J. Breed selection practices and traits of economic importance for indigenous chicken in Kenya. Livestock Research for Rural Development 2011; 23(209). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/10/oken23209.htm.
     Google Scholar
  24. Moreda E, Hareppal S, Johansson A, Sisaye T and Sahile Z. Characteristics of indigenous chicken production system in southwest and south part of Ethiopia. British Journal of Poultry Science 2013; 2 (3): 25–32.
     Google Scholar
  25. Halima H. Phenotypic and Genetic Characterization of Indigenous Chicken Populations in Northwest Ethiopia. PhD Thesis; University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  26. Fisseha M, Abera M and Tadelle D. Assessment of village chicken production system and evaluation of the productive and reproductive performance of local chicken ecotype in Bure district, North West Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2010; 5(13): 1739–1748.
     Google Scholar
  27. Oloyo A and Ojerinde A. “Poultry Housing and Management,” in Poultry-An Advanced Learning. London, United Kingdom: IntechOpen, 2019. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/65864 doi: 10.5772/intechopen.83811.
     Google Scholar
  28. Mujyambere V, Adomako K, Olympio S O, Ntawubizi M, Nyinawamwiza L, Mahoro J and Conroy A. Local chickens in East African region: their production and potential. Poultry Science 2022; 101(1): 101547. ISSN 0032-5791. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579121005691).
     Google Scholar
  29. Marwa L and Lukuyu B. Characterization and quantification of different indigenous chicken production, feeding and management systems in Babati district, Tanzania. International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) Page 129, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  30. Mbuza F, Habimana R, Simbankabo T and Majyambere D. Characterization of layer poultry production in Rwanda. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 2016; 6:1148–1156.
     Google Scholar
  31. Msoffe P L M, Bunn D, Muhairwa A P, Mtambo M M A, Mwamhehe H, Msago A, Mlozi M R S and Cardona C J. Implementing poultry vaccination and biosecurity at the village level in Tanzania: a social strategy to promote health in free-range poultry populations. Tropical Animal Health and Production 2010; 42: 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-009-9414-8.
     Google Scholar
  32. Gashu M and Bezabih M. Assessment of Chicken Production under Farmers Management Condition in East Gojam Zone, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia. Greener Journal of Animal Breeding Genetics 2014; 1(1):001–10.
     Google Scholar
  33. Dessie T and Ogle B. Village poultry production system in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 2001; 33: 521–537.
     Google Scholar
  34. Guni F S, Katule A M and Mwakilembe P A A. Characterization of local chickens in selected districts of the Southern Highlands of Tanzania: II. Production and Morphometric traits. Livestock Research for Rural Development 2013; 25:11. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd25/11/guni25190.htm.
     Google Scholar
  35. Shuma S and Gurmessa K. A study on management systems and performances of local chicken kept under smallholder farmers: the case of Jimmahorro district of Kelem Wollega Zone Western Oromia. Ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Technology 2021; 7:92–98.
     Google Scholar
  36. Bezabih M and Atalel W. Constraints and Opportunities of Village Chicken Production in Debsan TiKara Keble at Gonder Zuria Woreda, North Gonder, Ethiopia. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 2013; 3(9): 8.
     Google Scholar
  37. Yemane N, Tamir B and Belihu K. Characterization of village chicken production performance under scavenging system in Halaba districts of southern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Veterinary Journal 2013; 17(1): 69–80.
     Google Scholar
  38. Kugonza D R, Kyarisiima C C and Iisa A. Indigenous chicken flocks of Eastern Uganda: I. Productivity, management, and strategies for better performance. Livestock Research for Rural Development 2008; 20(137). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/9/kugo20137.htm.
     Google Scholar
  39. Moreki J C. Village poultry production in Serowe-Palapye sub-district of Botswana. Livestock Research for Rural Development 2010; 22(46). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/3/more22046.htm.
     Google Scholar
  40. Bezabih M and Zewudu A. Performance evaluation of local chicken at Enebsie Sar Midir Woreda, Eastern Gojjam, Ethiopia. Unique Research Journal of Agricultural Science. 2013; 1 (2): 006–010.
     Google Scholar
  41. Kabilika H S, Musonda M M and Sharma R N. Bacterial flora from dead-in-shell chicken embryos in Zambia. Indian Journal of Veterinary Research 1999; 8 (2): 1–6.
     Google Scholar
  42. Danilov R V. Effect of hen’s age on quality of hatching eggs and embryonic development. Proceeding of 21st World’s Poultry Congress, Montreal, Canada, 2000.
     Google Scholar
  43. Kirunda H, Muwereza N, Kasaija D P, Kerfua D S and Jumanyol K. Infectious and non-infectious factors affecting hatchability in indigenous chickens in Eastern Uganda. Africa Journal of Animal and Biomedical Sciences 2010; 5(3):51–59.
     Google Scholar
  44. McAinsh C V, Kusina J, Madsen J and Nyoni O. Traditional chickens’ production in Zimbabwe. World Poultry Science Journal 2004; 60:233–246.
     Google Scholar
  45. Petrus N P. Characterisation and production performance of indigenous chickens in Northern Namibia regions. PhD Dissertation, University of Namibia, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  46. Fentie T, Abebe B and Kassa T. Small-scale family poultry production in north Gondar: characteristics, productivity and constraints. Livestock Research for Rural Development 2013; 25(161). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd25/9/fent25161.htm
     Google Scholar
  47. Ringo E J and Mwenda V. Poultry subsector in Tanzania: A quick scan. Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 31 pages, 2018.
     Google Scholar