##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The use of unsustainable levels of chemical fertilizers and plant protection chemicals has resulted in a steady decline in soil and crop productivity the world over. Soil biology has undergone irreversible damage, coupled with a high concentration of toxic chemical residues in plant tissues and human bodies. Agricultural practices must evolve to sustainably meet the growing global demand for food without irreversibly damaging soil. Microbial biocontrol agents have tremendous potential to bring sustainability to agriculture in a way that is safe for the environment. Biopesticides do not kill non-target insects, and biosafety is ensured because biopesticides act as antidotes and do not lead to chemical contamination in the soil. This article is part of a larger study conducted in Ukraine by researchers at the Université de Montréal with the support of Mitacs and Earth Alive Clean Technologies. The responses of farmers who use biofertilizers (“user farmers”) and those who do not (“non-user farmers”), along with the responses of manufacturers or suppliers of biofertilizers, and research and development (R&D) scientists are captured to demonstrate the advantages of applying microbial biopesticides to field crops. Participants reported a 15-30% increase in yields and crop production after the application of biopesticides. With the use of biopesticides, farmers cultivated better quality fruits, grains, and tubers with a longer shelf life. Moreover, while the risk of crop loss remains high (60-70%) with chemically grown crops, this risk is reduced to 33% on average if crops are grown using biopesticides. The findings indicate that a large proportion of farmers would prefer to use biopesticides if they are effective and high quality products. In this context, the quality and effectiveness of products is therefore very important. Despite their benefits to soil, human health, and ecosystems, biopesticides face significant challenges and competition vis-à-vis synthetic pesticides for a variety of reasons. Therefore, the development of biopesticides must overcome the problems of poor quality products, short shelf life, delayed action, high market costs, and legal/registration issues.

References

  1. Oerke, E.C., Dehne, H.W., Schoenbeck, F. and Weber, A. (1994). Crop production and crop protection: Estimated losses in major food and cash crops. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. ISBN 0 444 82095 7.
     Google Scholar
  2. Rani, K., Sridevi, V., Kumar, K.V., Harsha, N. and Kumar, C.S. (2013). Biotechnological Approach in Biopesticides-An Overview. Elixir Agriculture, 55: 12936-12940. Available Online: https://www.elixirpublishers.com/articles/1360222157_55%20(2013)%2012936-12940.pdf, Accessed on 26 November 2020.
     Google Scholar
  3. Earth Alive (2017). Earth Alive’s Commitment to Sustainable Development. Aavailable online: http://earthalivect.com/about-us/sustainability/, Accessed on 18 January 2017.
     Google Scholar
  4. Simiyu, N.S.W., Tarus D., Watiti, J., Nang’ayo, F. (2013). Effective regulation of bio-fertilizers and bio-pesticides: A potential avenue to increase agricultural productivity, Compro II Policy Series, No. 1, 2013, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture. Available online: http://newint.iita.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/COMPRO-II-Policy-Series-Effective-Regulation-of-bio-fertilizers-and-bio-pesticides.pdf, Accessed on 26 November 2020.
     Google Scholar
  5. Devi, Vimaia P.S., Rao, Ranga G.V., Gopalakrishnan, S. and Sivakumar, G. (2012). Environmental impact of microbial pesticides. In: Dhillon, M.K., Sehrawat, K.L., Sharma, H.C. (eds.), Houston: Environmental Safety of Biotech and Conventional IPM Technologies, Studium Press LLC, pp. 261–272.
     Google Scholar
  6. Chattopadhyay, P., Banerjee, G. and Mukherjee, S. (2017). Recent trends of modern bacterial insecticides for pest control practice in integrated crop management system”. Biotech, 7(1): 60-70. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0717-6
     Google Scholar
  7. Arjjumend, H. and Koutouki, K. (2018). “Science of Biopesticides and Critical Analysis of Indian Legal Frameworks Regulating Biocontrol Agents”, International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, 11(3): 563-571. Doi: http:// doi.org/10.30954/0974-1712.06.2018.20
     Google Scholar
  8. Stefanovska, T.R., Pidlisnyuk, V.V. and Kaya, H.K. (2006). Biological control of pests in Ukraine: legacy from the past and challenges for the future. In, Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources. CAB Reviews. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1079/PAVSNNR20061008
     Google Scholar
  9. Hubbard, M., Hynes, R.K., Erlandson, M. and Bailey, K.L. (2014). The biochemistry behind biopesticide efficacy. Sustainable Chemical Processes, 2, 18. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40508-014-0018-x
     Google Scholar
  10. Bailey, K.L., Boyetchko, S.M. and Längle, T. (2010). Social and economic drivers shaping the future of biological control: a Canadian perspective on the factors affecting the development and use of microbial biopesticides. Biological Control, 52: 221-229. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.05.003
     Google Scholar
  11. Urs, A. (2015). The sorry tale of biopesticides. Business Standard, September 21, 2015. Available online: https://www.business-standard.com/article/punditry/the-sorry-tale-of-biopesticides-115092100014_1.html, Accessed on 26 November 2020.
     Google Scholar
  12. Birthal, P.S. and Sharma, O.P. (2004). Integrated pest management in Indian agriculture. New Delhi: National Centre For Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NCAP). Available online: http://www.ncap.res.in/upload_files/workshop/wsp11.pdf, Accessed on 26 November 2020.
     Google Scholar