Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Bangladesh
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Bangladesh
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Bangladesh
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Bangladesh
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Bangladesh
* Corresponding author

Article Main Content

The present investigation was carried out in the laboratory of the Department of Horticulture and Department of Agro-Preocessing, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur from May 2021 to July 2021 with three mango varieties viz. Langra, Amropali and Ashwina were harvested at different maturity stages to observe their storability under ambient conditions. The experiment was set up following a completely randomized design with three replications. Results revealed that the studied varieties had significant differences in physical characteristics such as fruit weight and chemical properties like total soluble solids, total sugar, and reducing sugar. Only the pH changes in the varietal and maturity stages were non-significant in this regard.  In the case of variety at 12 days after storage, the total soluble solid content ranged from 17.54 to 20.04%. Total sugar content decreased but pH and reducing sugar increased as storage day increased in case of variety and maturity stage. Change of vitamin-C in maturity stage II and III at 4, 8, and 12 days after storage had no significant differences among them. The highest dry matter (19.72%) content was found on Amrapali (19.08%); on the other hand, maturity stage III had the highest (19.08%) value at 12 days after storage in this respect.

References

  1. BBS. Statistical pocketbook of Bangladesh, Bangladesh bureau of statistics. Ministry of Planning Govt. of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka. 2020.
     Google Scholar
  2. Siddiqui MW, Dutta P, Dhua RS, Dey A. Changes in biochemical composition of mango in response to pre-harvest gibberellic acid spray. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus (ACS). 2014, 78(4): 331–335.
     Google Scholar
  3. Narayana CK, Pal RK, Roy SK. Effect of pre-storage treatments and temperature regimes on shelf-life and respiratory behavior of ripe Baneshan mango. J. Food Sci. Tec. Mysore. 1966. 33: 79–82.
     Google Scholar
  4. Carrillo LA, Ramirez-Bustamante FJB, Valdez-Torres R, Rojas-Villegas, Yahia EM. Ripening and quality changes in mango fruit as affected by coating with an edible film. J. Food Quality. 2000. 23: 479–486.
     Google Scholar
  5. Shahjahan MS, Sheel MA, Zaman MA, Sakur MA. Optimization of harvesting maturities for major mango cultivars in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research. 1994; 12: 209–215.
     Google Scholar
  6. Islam K, Khan MZH, Sarker MAR. Changes in Acidity, TSS, and Sugar Content at Different Storage Periods of the Postharvest Mango (Mangifera indica L.) influenced by Bavistin DF. International Food Science. 2013; 2013: 1–8.
     Google Scholar
  7. Absar N, Karim MR, Amin MA. A comparative study on the changes in the physico-chemical composition of ten varieties of mango in Bangladesh at different stages of maturity. Bangladesh J. Agric. Res. 1993. 18(2): 201–208.
     Google Scholar
  8. Saeed AN, Seema MSN, Muhammad N, Muhammad TS. Sensory evaluation of mangoes (Magnifera indica L.) grown in different regions of Pakistan. Pakistan J. Bot. 2009; 41 (6): 2821–2829.
     Google Scholar
  9. Mamiro P, Fweja L, Chove B, Kinabo J, George V, Mtebe K. Physical and chemical characteristics of off-vine ripened mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruit (Dodo). African Journal of Biotechnology. 2007; 6(21) 2477–2483.
     Google Scholar
  10. Ishtiaq AR, Aman UM, Ahmed SK, Basharat AS, Saeed AM. A new mango hybrid shows better shelf life and fruit quality. Pakistan Journal of Bot. 2010; 42 (4):2512.
     Google Scholar
  11. Singh NI, Dhuique-Mayer C, Lozano YVES. Physico-chemical changes during enzymatic liquefaction of mango pulp (cv. Keitt). Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 2000; 24(1):73–85.
     Google Scholar
  12. Thokchom R, Mandal G. Qualitative analysis of mango cv. Langra is influenced by various postharvest treatments. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 2019; 7(1):2167–2172.
     Google Scholar
  13. Paull RE, Chen NJ, Duputy J, Huang H, Cheng G, Gao F. Litchi growth and compositional changes during fruit development. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 1984; 109:817–821.
     Google Scholar
  14. Chan HT, Kwok SCM, Lee CWQ. Sugar composition and invertase activity in lychee. Journal of Food Science.1975; 40:772–774.
     Google Scholar
  15. Rathore HA, Masud T, Sammi S, Soomro AH. Effect of storage on physico-chemical composition and sensory properties of mango (Mangifera indica L.) variety Dosehari. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 2007; 6(2):143–148.
     Google Scholar
  16. Zaied NS, Khafagy SAA, Saleh MA. Evaluation of Some Mango Species by Fruit Characters and Fingerprint Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2007; 3(4): 316–320.
     Google Scholar
  17. Ali SY, Hossain M, Zakaria M, Haque M, Ahiduzzaman M. Physio-chemical characteristics of seven cultivars Mango (Mangifera Indica L.)” In Bangladesh. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. Res. 2019; 7(4):01–08.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)