Determinants of the Implementation of Agroecological Practices among Smallholder Farmers in Singida District, Tanzania



Abstract Views
695

Downloads
577

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Sep 6, 2022
Published Oct 31, 2022
10.24018/ejfood.2022.4.5.571

Abstract viewed = 695 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Agroecological farming is considered to be among the suitable approach toward sustainable food systems and environmental conservation. Characteristically agroecology is at low cost as it does not depend on expensive external inputs. Similar to other forms of more sustainable agriculture, implementation of its practices is generally low. There is scant information regarding the causes for its low implementation. This paper, therefore, looks into the determinants of the implementation of agroecological practices among smallholder farmers in Singida District, Tanzania. Specifically, the study uses data from household survey, focus group discussions, and key informants’ interviews. The study employed both descriptive and inferential analysis to establish determinants of the adoption of agroecological practices. A multiple linear regression model was employed to analyze the factors for decision to use agroecological practices, using a cross-sectional data from 160 randomly selected households. Thematic analysis was used to analyze qualitative data. The study findings indicate that the dominant agroecological practices are the application of organic fertilizers (such as farm yard manure, composite and green manure), intercropping, and crop rotation. The results, also show income, education level of the household head, distance from homestead to the farm, training on agroecology and land ownership were found to be associated with the implementation decision of agroecological practices by farming households. Besides, about 75% of farmers who decide to implement agroecology practices were those who access to training supports from FRN project. Based on the study findings, The Government and other stakeholders should insist more on improving training services to increase the implementation of agroecological practices. Also, the study recommends diversification of income sources on the farmers’ side by engaging in both on-farm and off-farm activities such as petty business to increase income which in turn will enable them to invest in the implementation of agroecology practices.

Keywords: Agroecological practices, Determinants, Implementation, Smallholder farmers.

References

  1. Wezel A, Casagrande M, Celette F, Vian JF, Ferrer A, Peigné J. Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2014; 4(1):1–20.
     Google Scholar
  2. Schoonhoven Y, Runhaar H. Conditions for the adoption of agro-ecological farming practices: a holistic framework illustrated with the case of almond farming in Andalusia. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 2018;16(6):442–454.
     Google Scholar
  3. Deaconu A, Berti PR, Cole DC, Mercille G, Batal M. Agroecology and nutritional health: A comparison of agroecological farmers and their neighbors in the Ecuadorian highlands. Food Policy. 2021;101:1–10.
     Google Scholar
  4. Tittonell P, Piñeiro G, Garibaldi LA, Dogliotti S, Olff H, Jobbagy EG. Agroecology in large scale farming-A research agenda. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2020 Dec 18;4:584605.
     Google Scholar
  5. Paracchini ML, Justes E, Wezel A, Zingari PC, Kahane R, Madsen S, et al. Agroecological practices supporting food production and reducing food insecurity in developing countries. A study on scientific literature in 17 countries. EUR 30329 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. 2020, ISBN 978-92-76-21077-1, doi:10.2760/82475, JRC121570.
     Google Scholar
  6. Teixeira HM, Van den Berg L, Cardoso IM, Vermue AJ, Bianchi FJ, Peña-Claros M, et al. Understanding farm diversity to promote agroecological transitions. Sustainability.2018;10(12):1–43.
     Google Scholar
  7. HLPE Agroecological and Other Innovative Approaches for Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems That Enhance Food Security and Nutrition. High-Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security, Rome.2019; [https://www.bayer.com/agriculture/innovations] site visited on 12/08/2020.
     Google Scholar
  8. Gallardo-López F, Hernández-Chontal MA, Cisneros-Saguilán P, Linares-Gabriel A. Development of the concept of agroecology in Europe: A review. Sustainability. 2018;10(4):1–12.
     Google Scholar
  9. Oteros-Rozas E, Ravera F, García-Llorente M. How does agroecology contribute to the transitions towards social-ecological sustainability? Sustainability. 2019;11(16):43–72.
     Google Scholar
  10. Runhaar H, Wilk B, Persson Å, Uittenbroek C, Wamsler C. Mainstreaming climate adaptation: taking stock about “what works” from empirical research worldwide. Regional environmental change. 2017 Apr;18(4):1201–10.
     Google Scholar
  11. Abera W, Lulseged Tamene L, Tibebe D, Adimassu Z, Kassa H, Hailu H, et al. Characterizing and evaluating the impacts of national land restoration initiatives on ecosystem services in Ethiopia. 2020;31(1):37–52.
     Google Scholar
  12. Oyetunde-Usman, Z., Olagunju, K. O., and Ogunpaimo, O. R. Determinants of adoption of multiple sustainable agricultural practices among smallholder farmers in Nigeria. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. 2021;9(2):241–248.
     Google Scholar
  13. De Snoo GR, Herzon I, Staats H, Burton, Rob JF, Schindler S, et al. Conservation Letters 6 (2013) 66–72. Wiley Periodicals, Inc Chen WK. Linear Networks and Systems, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. 1993;123–135.
     Google Scholar
  14. Benitez-Altuna F, Trienekens J, Materia VC, Bijman J. Factors affecting the adoption of ecological intensification practices: A case study in vegetable production in Chile. Agricultural Systems Journal. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103283.
     Google Scholar
  15. Pretty, J. Agricultural Sustainability: Concepts, Principles, and Evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences,2008; 363,447–465.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2163.
     Google Scholar
  16. Duru M, Therond O, Fares M. Designing agroecological transitions; A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2015; 13(2):1–22. DOI 10.1007/s13593-015-0318-x.
     Google Scholar
  17. Ojo S, Ogunyemi I. Analysis of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Improved Cassava Production Technology in Ekiti State, Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. 2014; 1,40–44.
     Google Scholar
  18. URT. Singida Socio-Economic Profile, 2015: National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Finance and Singida Regional Secretariat. Singida. 2017; 227.
     Google Scholar
  19. Isinika AC, Jeckoniah J, Mdoe, Mwajombe K. Sunflower Commercialisation in Singida Region: Pathways for Livelihood Improvement. APRA Working Paper 67: FAC ICE Team-Publications,Working Papers.
     Google Scholar
  20. Clark VLP, Ivankova T. Mixed Methods Research: A Guide to the Field. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage Publications. 2016; 368.
     Google Scholar
  21. . Creswell JW, Plano, Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage. 2011; 457.
     Google Scholar
  22. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) [Tanzania]. Tanzania National
     Google Scholar
  23. Panel Survey Report (NPS)-Wave 3, 2012-2013. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 2014; 120.
     Google Scholar
  24. Kothari CR. Research methodology: Methods and techniques. 2nd ed. New Age International; 2004.
     Google Scholar
  25. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). Food Security Impact of Agricultural Technology Adoption under Climate Change: Micro-Evidence from Niger. Rome. 2015; 139.
     Google Scholar
  26. Kingu HA. Role of Institutions in Household Food Security in Tanzania: A Case of Singida Region.Tengeru Community Development Journal. 2020;7(1):1-18.
     Google Scholar
  27. Fasha GS, Minde A. Livelihood Assessments among Small-holder Farmers in the Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor in Tanzania: Lessons from Households in Ihemi Cluster. Tanzania Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2020; 19(2):116–130.
     Google Scholar
  28. Constantine J, Sibuga KP, Shitindi MJ, Hilberk A. Awareness and Application of Existing Agroecological Practices by Small Holder Farmers in Mvomero and Masasi Districts-Tanzania. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2021;13(1):1-13.
     Google Scholar
  29. Wezel A, Herren BG, Kerr RB, Barrios E, Gonçalves ALR, Sinclair F. Agroecological principles and elements and their implications for transitioning to sustainable food systems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2020; 40(6):1–13.
     Google Scholar
  30. Udimal TB, Jincai Z, Mensah OS, Caesar AE. Factors Influencing the Agricultural Technology Adoption: The Case of Improved Rice Varieties (Nerica) in the Northern Region, Ghana. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development. 2017; 8:137–148.
     Google Scholar
  31. Nigussie Z, Tsunekawa A, Haregeweyn N, Adgo E, Nohmi M, Tsubo M, et al. Factors influencing small-scale farmers’ adoption of sustainable land management technologies in north-western Ethiopia. Land Use Policy. 2017;67:57–64.
     Google Scholar
  32. Amare A. Simane B. Determinants of smallholder farmers’ decision to adopt adaptation options to climate change and variability in the Muger Sub-basin of the Upper Blue Nile basin of Ethiopia. Agriculture and Food Security. 2017;6(1):1–20.
     Google Scholar
  33. Bongole AJ, Kitundu KMK, Hella J. Usage of Climate Smart Agriculture Practices: An Analysis of Farm Households' Decisions in Southern Highlands of Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2020;19(2):238–255.
     Google Scholar
  34. Ullah A, Khan D, Zheng S, Ali U. Factors influencing the adoption of improved cultivars: a case of peach farmers in Pakistan. Ciência Rural. 2018;48:1–11.
     Google Scholar
  35. Mugure A, Oino PG, Sorre BM. Land ownership and its impact on the adoption of agroforestry practices among rural households in Kenya: a case of Busia county. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies. 2013 Nov; 4(3):552–9.
     Google Scholar
  36. Foguesatto CR, Borges JAR, Machado JAD. A review and some reflections on farmers' adoption of sustainable agricultural practices worldwide, Science of the Total Environment. (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138831.
     Google Scholar
  37. Kangmennaang, J., Kerr, RB., Lupafya, E., Dakishoni, L., Katundu, M. and Luginaah, I. Impact of a participatory agroecological development project on household wealth and food security in Malawi. Food Security. 2017; 9(3):561–576.
     Google Scholar