Production of Fine Count Yarns from Some Extra-long Egyptian Cottons on Different Spinning Systems
Article Main Content
The current research was carried out to produce fine count yarns from extra-long Egyptian cotton varieties using compact and ring spinning systems.in addition, to compare between compact yarns and ring yarns in terms of their physical and mechanical properties. Three commercial extra-long staple Egyptian cottons Giza92, Giza93 and Giza 96 were used to produce four linear densities of 80, 100, 120 and 140 at 3.6 twist multiplier. Results obtained showed that Giza 92 was surpassed significantly other extra -long staple varieties. It recorded the highest mean values of yarn strength and yarn evenness While, the same variety recorded the lowest mean values of yarn hairiness and imperfections. Compact yarns were much better than yarns spun on the ring spinning in yarn strength, yarn elongation, evenness, yarn imperfections and yarn hairiness. Yarn count 80,s gave higher single yarn strength (20.89cN/tex), yarn elongation (5.03%) and yarn evenness (17.49%) and lower yarn hairiness (2.04) and imperfections than yarn count 140s. Single yarn strength, yarn elongation and yarn evenness were decreased with increasing yarn count. While the number of neps, hairiness, the number of thin and thick places were increased with increasing yarn count. Concerning, the effect of interaction between cotton varieties × yarn counts × spinning systems on yarn quality properties. Yarn count 80s recorded the highest mean values of yarn strength (23.14, 21.1 and 20.2 cN/tex) and yarn evenness (17.72, 16.53 and 16.79%) for varieties Giza92, Giza93 and Giza96, respectively for compact spinning system. Yarn strength at count 80, 100, 120 and 140 correlated negatively and highly significant with micronaire value and maturity ratio.
References
-
M.N. El Banna, M.A.M. El- Sayed, M.A.A. Nassar and A.A.A. El-Banna, “Impact of ring and compact spinning systems on the quality of Egyptian cotton properties,” 2nd Alexandria International of Cotton Conference, Alexandria Univ. Egypt, 10-11 April 2013.
Google Scholar
1
-
H.D. Kenndy, Selection and response of yield and fiber traits in upland cotton, M.S. Thesis. Texas A&M Univ., USA. pp. 1-85. 2018.
Google Scholar
2
-
N. Ozdil, E. Ozdogan, A. Demirel and T. Oktem, “A comparative study of the cha racteristics of compact yarn based knitted fabrics,” Fibers & Textile in Eastern Europe, Vol. 13, no.2, pp. 39-43, 2005.
Google Scholar
3
-
Z.M.D. Islam, “Comparing quality parameters of yarn produced by ring, rotor, and compact spinning system,” European scientific Journal, Vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1857-7881, 2019.
Google Scholar
4
-
M. Nikolic, Z. Stjepanovic, F. Lesjak, and A. Stritof, “Compact spinning for improved quality of ring spun yarns,” Fibers & Textiles in Eastern Europe, Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 30-35, 2003.
Google Scholar
5
-
M. R. Rashid, F. Ahmed, A.K. Azad, and A.N.M. Ullah, “Comparative study on cotton yarn quality made from compact and conventional ring frame,” Journal of Innovation & Development Strategy, Vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 61-66, 2011.
Google Scholar
6
-
S. Subramanian, and N. Gobi, “Effect of process parameters at comber on yarn and fabric properties,” Indian Journal of Fiber &Textile Research, Vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 196-199, 2004.
Google Scholar
7
-
ASTM, American Society for Testing and Materials. Standards of Textile Testing and Materials D 4605-86, USA. 1986.
Google Scholar
8
-
ASTM, American Society for Testing and Materials. Standards of Textile Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa. D2256-91, D1425-91.USA.1991
Google Scholar
9
-
K. A. Gomez and A. A. Gomez, “Statistical procedures for agricultural research 2nd edition,” John Willey & Sons, New York. USA. pp.704, 1984.
Google Scholar
10
-
W. Snedecor and W.G. Cochran, “Statistical methods 7th ed,” Iowa State Univ., Press Ames, Iowa. 1980.
Google Scholar
11
-
M.H. El- Shakankery, A.E.I. Ibrahim, AEAE El-Banna, “Predicting strength properties for ring and compact Egyptian cotton spun yarns using artificial neural network,” Journal of the Textile Association, pp. 346-352, 2014.
Google Scholar
12
-
S. E. D. Elayan, A. M. Abdalla, N. T. Ahmed, E. R. El-Sayed. “Comparison between ring and compact spun from long staple Egyptian cotton varieties,” Journal of Agriculture. Science. Mansoura Univ., Vol. 33, no. 7 pp. 4761-4769, 2008.
Google Scholar
13
-
S. Altas and H. Kadoğlu, “Comparison of conventional ring, mechanical compact and pneumatic compact yarn spinning systems,” Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, Vol. 7, no.1, pp. 87-100, 2012.
Google Scholar
14
-
H. Deussen, “Improved cotton fiber properties the textile industry’s key to success in global competition,” In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conference, New Orleans, LA., Natl. Cotton Council. Am., Memphis, TN. pp. 90–96. 10-14 January 1993.
Google Scholar
15
-
K.M.K. Doaa, Technological studies some cotton wastes, M.S. Thesis, Fac, Agric., Saba Basha, Alexandria Univ., Egypt. 2003.
Google Scholar
16
-
W.M.A. Asal, “Effect of cotton fiber properties on yarn quality”, M.S. Thesis, Fac, Agric., Saba Basha, Alexandria Univ., Egypt. 2003.
Google Scholar
17
-
S.H. Sanad, H.E.M. Mahmoud, and M.A.M. El-Sayed, “Production of carded compact cotton yarn of comparable quality to the combed conventional ring yarn,” Egypt J Agric Res, Vol. 89, no.1, pp. 203-212, 2011.
Google Scholar
18
-
M.E. Ureyen and H. Kadoglu, “Regressional estimation of ring cotton yarn properties from HVI fiber properties,”Textile Res. J., Vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 360-366, 2006.
Google Scholar
19
-
M.A. Hagar, and A.A. Hassan, “Use of correlation and regression analysis in estimating relative importance of fiber properties affecting yarn hairiness in some Egyptian cotton genotypes,” International Journal of Advanced Research, Vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 1274-1284. 2016.
Google Scholar
20
-
F.S.A. Tolba, Production of low priced, medium and coarse yarns using rotor spinning system, M.S. Thesis. Dep. Agronomy. Fac of Agric. Benha Univ., Egypt. 2017.
Google Scholar
21
-
A.F.A. Entsar, G.Y.M. Hammam, A.A.A. El- Hosary, E.M.M. El- Gedwy, and A.A. Hassan, “Influence of some commercial blends between the imported cotton and the upper Egyptian varieties on technological properties,” Annals of Agricultural Science, Moshtohor, Vol. 57, no. 1 pp. 31-38, 2019.
Google Scholar
22
-
A.E.M. Gadalla and R.M. Abdel-Tawab, “Effect of blending treatments between upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and Giza95 cultivar (Gossypium barbadense L.) on fiber and yarn quality,” Bulletin of Fac. Agric., Cairo Univ., Vol. 70, no 4, pp. 351-361, 2019.
Google Scholar
23
-
M.A.M. El-Sayed, and S. H. Sanad, “The impact of new spinning technologies on the Egyptian cottons,” Autex Resarch Journal, Vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 231-238, 2007.
Google Scholar
24





