##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This work investigates the nutritional qualities of three common local tomato cultivars UTC, Dan -Masari and Dan-Eka in Dutsinma Local Government using standard techniques. The proximate, mineral, vitamins and lycopene contents were determined using AOAC method of analysis and the values were as follows. The moisture contents of the tomatoes were 95.56± 0.16 %, 93.85±0.12 %, 93.97±0.61 % for UTC, Dan-masari and Dan-eka respectively. Ash content were 0.36±0.03 %, 0.47±0.06 %, 0.51±0.09 % respectively. Protein content were 0.99±0.04 %, 0.73±0.07 %, and 0.79±0.79 % in the same order. Total carbohydrate for UTC indicated values of 2.58±0.24%, Dan-eka indicated value of 4.72±0.04% and Dan-masari indicated values of 4.53±0.38 %. While the fat content showed 0.19±0.00 %, 0.73±0.07 %, 0.188±0.01 % in that order. For vitamin A, the results were 19.80±0.73 mg/kg, 18.93±0.71 mg/kg and 15.49±0.24 mg/kg respectively. For vitamin B2 and B3 UTC has 0.003±0.00 mg/kg and 0.05±0.18 mg/kg in the same respect, Dan-eka showed B2 0.05±0.08 mg/kg and B3 0.15±0.20 mg/kg respectively while Dan-masari indicated B2 0.000±0.00 mg/kg and B3 0.15±0.20 mg/kg and vitamin C indicated values of 42.68±8.93 mg/kg for UTC, Dan-eka showed 52.82±3.60 mg/kg and Dan-masari showed values of 84.47±1.67 mg/kg. The lycopene content UTC has the values of 116.01±1.59 mg/kg, Dan-eka indicated 127.18±3.65 mg/kg and Dan-masari showed 91.36±2.24 mg/kg. The mineral content for potassium indicated values of 3.74±0.28 ppm, 3.40±0.16 ppm, 3.08±0.61 ppm for UTC, Dan-eka and Dan-masari respectively. For the iron content, 0.008±0.04 ppm, 0.002±0.00 ppm and 0.004±0.00 ppm of UTC, Dan-eka and Dan-masari respectively. Magnesium values were 0.27±0.07 ppm, 0.22±0.16 ppm and 0.25±0.02 ppm correspondingly. For calcium, the obtained values were 0.26±0.04 ppm, 0.26±0.05 ppm, 0.38±0.07 ppm respectively. The sodium contents were 0.18±0.02 ppm, 0.18±0.08 ppm, 0.30±0.13 ppm in that order. These local varieties grown in Dutsinma are also good source of nutrient with no difference in the physiological quality parameters compared to the one been imported. However, Dan-eka shows higher content of these nutrients in terms of lycopene and vitamin contents which makes it the best of these cultivars. However the results of this work suggest that three cultivars can provide good industrial raw materials for paste production because their total solids are within the range of specification and can meet daily recommended intake of lycopene and vitamin, moreover the low fat values for these samples gives it a positive nutritional implication.

References

  1. Aoun, A.B., Lechiheb, B., Benyahya, L. and Ferchichi, A. (2013). Evaluation of fruit quality traits of traditional varieties of tomato (Solanumlycopersicum) grown in Tunisia. African Journal of Food Science,7(10): 350-354.
     Google Scholar
  2. Umeh, V. C., Kuku, F. O., Nwanguma, E. I., Adebayo, O. S. and Manga, A. A. (2002). A survey of the Insect Pests and Farmers Practices in the Cropping of Tomato in Nigeria.Tropicultura.20:181-186.
     Google Scholar
  3. Denton, O. A. and Swarup, V. (2008). Tomato cultivation and its potential in Nigeria. Acta Horticulturae, 123, 257-263.
     Google Scholar
  4. Adelana, B. O. (2007). Effect staking on growth and yield of tomatoes, East African Journal of Science, 41(3): 243-249.
     Google Scholar
  5. Tee, E. S., Mohd Ismail, N., MohdNasir, A., and Kahtijah, I. (2009). Nutrient composition of Malaysian foods, 4th Edition, Malaysian Food Composition Database Programme, Institute for Medical Research, Kuala Lumpur, pp.310.
     Google Scholar
  6. Nielsen, S.S. (2002). An Introduction to the Chemical Analysis of Food.Satish Kumar Jain for CBS Publishers and Distributiors, 459611-A, 11 Darya Ganj, New Delhi (India). Pp 83-175.
     Google Scholar
  7. Rodriguez-Amaya, D.B., and Kimura, M. (2004). Harvest plus handbook for carotenoid analysis in Harvest plus Technical Monograph, Series 2; International Food Policy Research Institute and International Center for Tropical Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA.
     Google Scholar
  8. Krinsky, N.I., and Yeum, K.J. (2005). Carotenoidradica interactions. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communication, 305:754-760.
     Google Scholar
  9. Unlu, N.Z., Bohn, T., Francis, D. M., Nagaraja, H.N., Clinton, S.K., and Schwartz, S.J. (2007). Lycopene from heat indiced Cisisomer rich tomato sauce is more available than all trans-isomer rich tomato sauce in human. Journal of Nutrition, 98: 140-146.
     Google Scholar
  10. Naika, S., J. vanLidt de Jeude., M. de Goffau., M. Hilmi and B.van Dam. (2005). Cultivation of tomato production, processing and marketing.CTA.Series no 17.
     Google Scholar
  11. Thrumbo, P.R. (2005). Are there adverse effects of lycopene exposure? Journal of Nutrition, 135: 2060-2061.
     Google Scholar
  12. Akanbi, C. and Oludemi, F. (2004). Effect of processing and packaging on the lycopene content of tomato products. International Journal of Food Properties. 7(1): 139-152.
     Google Scholar
  13. Adedeji, O., Taiwo, K. A., Akanbi, C. T. and Ajani, R. (2006). Physicochemical properties of four tomato cultivars grown in Nigeria.Journal of food processing and preservation. 30(1):79-86.
     Google Scholar
  14. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutsin-Ma.
     Google Scholar
  15. AOAC, (2005). Official Methods Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemist. Washington, D. C. U.S. A.
     Google Scholar
  16. Owusu, J., Haile, M., Wang, Z., and Amissah, A. (2012). Effect of drying methods on physicochemical properties of pretreated tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum mill.) slices. Journal of Food Technology, Biotechnology and Nutrition 7(1-2): 106111.
     Google Scholar
  17. Mohammed, S.M., Abdurrahman, A.A. and Attahiru M. (2017). Proximate Analysis and Total Lycopene Content of Some Tomato Cultivars Obtained from Kano State, Nigeria Chem Search Journal, 8(1): 64 – 69. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/csj.v8i1.9.
     Google Scholar
  18. Sahin, F.H., Ulger, P. Aktas, T. and Orak, H. (2010). Effects of Different Drying Techniques of Some Nutritional Components of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum). Journal of Agricultural Machinery Science, 6(1), 71-78.
     Google Scholar
  19. Hossain, M.E., JahangirAlam, M., Hakim, M.A., Amanullah, A.S.M., and Ahsanullah, A.S.M. (2010). An assessment of physicochemical properties of some tomato genotypes and varieties grown at Rangpur. Bangladesh Research Publications Journal, 4(3): 235-243.
     Google Scholar
  20. Badejo, A. A., Adebowale, A. P., Enujiugha, V. N. (2016). Changes in Nutrient Composition, Antioxidant Properties and Enzyme Activities of Snake Tomato (Trichosanthes cucumerina) during ripening. Journal of Nutrition and. Food Science, 21 (2): 90 – 96.
     Google Scholar
  21. Adubofuor, J., Amankwah, E.A. Arthur, B.S., and Appiah, F. (2010). Comparative study related to physic-chemical properties and sensory attributes of tomato juice produced from oranges, tomatoes and carrots. African journal of Food Science, 4(7): 427-433.
     Google Scholar
  22. Suleiman, A.E., Awin, K.M.A., and Yousif, M.T. (2011). Suitability of some tomato (lycopersiconesculentum Mill). Genotypes for paste production. Journal of Science and
     Google Scholar
  23. Technology 12(2): 45-51.
     Google Scholar
  24. Campos, C. A. B., Fernandes, P. D., Gheyi, H. R., Blanco, F. F., Goncalves, C. B. and Campos, S.A.F. (2006). Yield and fruit quality of industrial tomato under saline irrigation. Science Agric, 2:63 - 69.
     Google Scholar
  25. Sobowale, S.S., Olatidoye, O.P., Odunmbaku, L.A. and Raji, O.H. (2012). A comparative study on physicochemical and rheological properties of imported tomato paste in Nigeria. Sustainable Agriculture Research, 1(2): 51.
     Google Scholar
  26. Arslan, D. and Özcan, M.M. (2011). Drying of tomato slices: changes in drying kinetics, mineral contents, antioxidant activity and colour parameters. Journal of Food, 9(3): 229-236.
     Google Scholar
  27. Ismail, I. A., Nasiru, A., Abdullahi, M. A. and Abdullahi, S.I. (2016). Proximate, mineral and vitamin analysis of fresh and canned Tomato. Vol 1163-1169.
     Google Scholar
  28. Hongyan, Q., Hua, L., Zhao, L. and Zhou, L. (2011). Carbohydrate Metabolism in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum mill.) Seedlings and Yield and Fruit Quality as Affected by Low Night Temperature and Subsequent Recovery. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(30), 5743-5749. http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB.
     Google Scholar
  29. Gould, W.A. (2004). Tomato production, Processing and Technology Baltimore, USA: CTI Publications.
     Google Scholar
  30. Leoni, C. and Jongen, W. (2003). Improving the nutritional quality of processed fruits & vegetables: the case of tomatoes. Fruit and vegetable processing: improving quality pp52-66.
     Google Scholar
  31. Theeranat S. (2016). Analyzing Lycopene Content in Fruits. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 11 (2016) 46- 48.
     Google Scholar
  32. Etminam, M., Takkouche, B. and Caamano-Isorna, F. (2004). The role of tomato products and lycopene in the prevention of prostate cancer: A meta analysis of observational studies. Cancer Epideomology biomarkers and prevention, 13(3):340-5.
     Google Scholar
  33. Abdullahi, I.I., Abdullahi, N., Abdu, A.M. and Ibrahim, A.S. (2016). Proximate, Mineral and Vitamin Analysis of Fresh and Canned Tomato. Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia, 13(2): 1163-1169.
     Google Scholar
  34. Umoh, G.S. (2006). Resource Use Efficiency in Urban Farming: An Application of Stochastic Frontier Production Function. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 8(1), 37-44.
     Google Scholar
  35. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), National Nutrient Databases for Standard Reference, Release 20, 2007
     Google Scholar
  36. Harry, W.J. Encyclopaedia of Agricultural Science, volume V S-W. Index. (1994); pp 337-349.
     Google Scholar
  37. Romain, H.R. (2001). Crop production in Tropical Africa. CIP Royal library Albert I, Brussseis. pp. 467-475.
     Google Scholar
  38. Arvanitoyannis, I.S., Vaitsi, O. and Mavromatis, A. (2008). Potato: a comparative study of the effect of cultivars and cultivation conditions and genetic modification on the physicochemical properties of potato tubers in conjunction with multivariate analysis towards authenticity. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 48(9): 799- 823.
     Google Scholar