Organic Weed Control Measures for Nigerian Cropping System
Article Main Content
The need for sustainability has been the focus of every country especially developing countries of which Nigeria belongs. Population increases at an uncontrollable dimension and the provision of food for the populace becomes paramount. The productivity of crops is seriously hampered due to influence of weds which reduce the quantity and quality of plants by affecting plants growth, development and yield. Weeds reduce crops performance by as much as 80% in an uncontrolled situation. To increase crops yield and control weeds, synthetic substances like inorganic fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides were introduced into Nigerian cropping system. These off-farm-inputs caused soil degradation, soil compartment, soil pollution and environmental hazard as well as life uncertainty (insecurity) as herbicides enter water bodies and affect animals and human when such polluted underground water is used. Research on more efficient and effective means of saving the soil from destruction and adequate weed control measures gave rise to organic farming. The emergence of organic weed control is geared towards the effective control of weeds with environmental consideration and soil enrichment. Many organic weed control measures have been identified in Nigerian cropping system to include: use of cover crops, use of green manure, use of crop rotation, use of soil fauna, tillage, use of allelopathic plants, use of farmyard manures and biofertilizers. It was recommended that for increased food production to be achieved, organic farming system should be adopted, government at all levels should give more attention to the training of more personnel who will adequately control weeds, organic weed control measures should be advocated (encouraged) and there should be enlightenment for the Nigerian farmers on the need to adopt organic weed control measures in their cropping system for increased crop productivity.
References
-
Singh, N.B and Verma, K.K (1998). Production Potential and Economic analysis ofrice-based cropping systems. Indian journal of agronomy 43:199-203.
Google Scholar
1
-
Willey, R.W and Osiru, DSO (2000). Studies on mixtures of maize and beans with particular referenced to plant population. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Cambridge 79:519-529.
Google Scholar
2
-
Wiro, K.O. (2020). Assessing the level of utilization of certified seeds by Horticultural Farmers in Rivers State. International Journal of Education Humanities and multidisciplinary Research. 10(1):108-116.
Google Scholar
3
-
Ansa, J.E.O and Wiro, K.O (2018). Potential of Taungya System for sustainable livelihoods Nigeria. Science and Industrial Technology Education Journal 6(1): 28-38.
Google Scholar
4
-
Wiro, K.O. and Ansa, J.E.O. (2019). Socio-economic potential of taungya farming for sustainable food production in Nigeria. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research Innovations 7(4): 13-21.
Google Scholar
5
-
Finamore, A., Britti, M.S., Roselli, M, Bellovina, D., Graetani, S and Mengheri, E. (2004). Novel Aproach for food safety evaluation. Results of a pilot experiment to evaluate organic and conventional foods. Journal of Agriculture and food chemistry 52:7425-7431.
Google Scholar
6
-
Stinner, D.H (2007). “The Science of organic farming” In William Lockeretz (ed). Organic farming: An International History. Oxford shire, UK and Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Google Scholar
7
-
Patidar, S. (2015). A study of perception of farmers towards organic farming. International Journal of Application innovation in Engineering and Management (IJAIEM) 4(3):269-277.
Google Scholar
8
-
Gambo, B.A., Magiji, M.D., Yakubu, AL. and Dikko, A.U. (2008). Effects of-farm yard manure and weed interference on the growth and yield of onion (Ailuim cepa). Journal of sustainable Agriculture and Environment; 3(2): 87-92.
Google Scholar
9
-
Clark, A. (2001). Effect of planting dates and intra row spacing on the performance of two cultivar of sweet potato. Boston L.C. page and Co. 88-102.
Google Scholar
10
-
Makinde, E.Q.A., Ayemi, L.S., Ojeniyi, S.O. and Odedina, T.N. (2010). Effect of organic, organic-mineral and NPK fertilizer on nutritional quality of Amaranthus in Lagos, Nigeria. Researchers. 2(2):91-96.
Google Scholar
11
-
Muller, Z.0. (2004). Feed animal from animal waste: Feeding manual. FAO Animal production and health paper 28:214. http//catalogue.nla.gov .au/record/23 51034.
Google Scholar
12
-
Tuck, S.l., Wingrist, C and Mota, F (2014). Land use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity: a hierarchy and meta-analysis Journal of Applied Ecology 5 (1):746-755.
Google Scholar
13
-
Tarhalker, P.P. and Rao, N.G.P. (1995). Changing concepts of practices of cropping systems. Indian Farming 25:3-7.
Google Scholar
14
-
Trenbath. BR. (1996). Resource use by intercrops in Francis, C.A. (eds) multiple cropping systems. Macmillan publishing company, New York.
Google Scholar
15
-
Adesina, O. L. and Wiro, K.O (2020). Influence of poultry manure rates on the growth and yield of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench) in Rivers State. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 42 (1): 116-120.
Google Scholar
16
-
Sharma, BR. and Rajput, A.L. (2005). Sustained rice production in Eastern India through efficient waste management techniques. Indian Journal of Agronomy 35:85-90.
Google Scholar
17
-
Tiripathi, S.S., Vivex, C. and Dhyani, B.P. (1998). Economics and nutrient harvest in sequential cropping systems. Indian Journal of Agronomy 43:248-252.
Google Scholar
18
-
Akobundu, 1.0. (1987). Weed science in the tropics, principles and practice. John Willey and Sons Inter-Science Publication. New York 103.
Google Scholar
19
-
Ansa, J. E. O and Iyagba, A. G. (1999). Elements of Tropical Crop Husbandary. Obchikel publishers, 17/19 Emenike street, mile 1 Diobu, Port Harcourt, Rivers State. 89-99.
Google Scholar
20
-
Adejonwo, K.O., Ahmed, M.K., Lagoke, S.T.0. and’ Karikari, S.K. (2009). Effects of variety nitrogen and period of weed interference on growth and yield of okra (Abelmoschus esculeptus). Nigerian Journal of Weed Science, 2:21-27.
Google Scholar
21
-
Wiro, K.O. and Iyagba, A.G. (2020). Effect of Weeding Regime on the Performance of Cucumber (Cucumus sativus) In the South-South Rainforest of Nigeria. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Development (AJMRD) Volume 2, Issue 7 (July-2020), PP 34-38ISSN: 2360-821X www.ajmrd.com.
Google Scholar
22
-
Ansa, J.E.O, Wiro, K.O and Garjila, Y.A. (2019). Potential of laterite soil for the production of elephant grass (pennisetum purpureum) in Nigeria. International Journal of Life Science Research. 7(4):1-4.
Google Scholar
23
-
Stall. WJvl. (2011). Weed control update for cucurbits crops (Muskmelon, cucumber, squash and watermelon) (online). Available at http://eclis.ifas.uf1.edu/wgo29 (verified 18 July, 2011).
Google Scholar
24
-
Noble, 0. (2011). Working towards better cucubits weed management strategies for the coming season (ontime) available at http://www.growingmagazine.com/fruits/working towardsbetter-cucurbit (verified 1 8 July, 2011).
Google Scholar
25
-
Delate, Kathleen, "Weed Management for Organic Farmers" (2003).Extension and Outreach Publications. 53.http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/extension_pubs/5.
Google Scholar
26
-
Aldrich, R.J. (2004). Weed crop ecology: principles in weed management. Breton Publishers, North Scituate, MA, 465.
Google Scholar
27
-
Ogg, A.G., and Dawson, J.H. (1984). Time of emergence of eight weed species. Weed Science 32: 327-335.
Google Scholar
28
-
Hosmani. M.M. & Maitis, S.S. (1993). Non chemical means of weed management in crop production. In: proceedings of the symposium on integrated weed management for sustainable agriculture. Indian Society of Weed Science, Hissar, India.
Google Scholar
29
-
Hatcher, P.E. and Melander, B. (2003) Combining physical, cultural and biological methods: prospects for integrated non-chemical weed management strategies. Weed Research, 43 (5). pp. 303-322. ISSN 0043-1737 doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2003.00352.x.
Google Scholar
30
-
Gliessman. S.R. (1983). Allelopathic interactions in crop/weed mixtures: Application for weed management. Journal of Chemical Ecology 9:991-999.
Google Scholar
31
-
Effa, E.B., Uko, A.E., Undie, U.L and Ansa, J.E.O (2018). Intra-Row spacing and variety interaction effects on the yield performance of sunflower (Helianthus annuus. L) in Calabar. Journal of Agricultural studies. 6(2):133-144.
Google Scholar
32
-
Tyler, D.D., Wagger, M.G., McCracken, D.V., Hargrove, W.L and Carter, M.R (2014). Role of conservation tillage in sustainable agriculture in the Southern United States, Conservation in tillage in temperate grocesystems. Lewis publications incorated, Boca Raton, 209-229.
Google Scholar
33
-
Burgos, N.R and Talbert, R.E (1996). Weed control by spring cover crops and imazethapus in no-till Southern Pea (Vigina unguiculata). Weed Technology 10:893-899.
Google Scholar
34
-
Amanullah, M.M., Somasundaram, E., Sathyamoorthic, K and Thukkaiyanman, P (2008). Organic farming in relation to food and environmental security a review, green farming 1(10):5-10.
Google Scholar
35
-
Bahi, G.S and Pasricha, N.S (2001). Direct and residual effect of green manuring in relation to fertilizer nitrogen on Toria (Brassica napus (L)) and sunflower (Halianthus annuus (L)) Journal of Indian Society of soil Science 49(1):113-117.
Google Scholar
36
-
Roberson, E.B; Sarig, S. and Firestonck, M.K (1991). Cover crop management of polysaccharide mediated aggregation in an orchard soil. Soil Science Society American Journal, 55:734-739.
Google Scholar
37
-
Altieri, M.A and Liebman, M. (2006). Insect weed and plant disease management in multiple cropping system. In: Francis C.A (eds) multiple cropping systems. Macmilliam publishing Company, New York.
Google Scholar
38
-
Zhang, Y. H (2010). Induced effects of exogenous phenolic acids on allelopathy of a wild rice accession (oryza congistaminata). Rice Science 17:135-140.
Google Scholar
39
-
Saubidet,M.I., Fatta, N and Barneix, A.J (2000). The effects of inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense on growth and nitrogen utilization by wheat plants. Plant soil 243 (2). 215-222.
Google Scholar
40
-
Remans, R., Spaepen, S. and Vanderleyden, J (2006). Auxin signaling in plant defense. Plant science 313:171-179.
Google Scholar
41





