Husbandry and Productivity of Red Maasai Sheep in Arumeru and Monduli Districts in Tanzania



Abstract Views
127

Downloads
89

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Jul 21, 2023
Published Sep 21, 2023
10.24018/ejfood.2023.5.5.717

Abstract viewed = 127 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This study was undertaken to describe the husbandry practices and productivity of the Red Maasai sheep in Arumeru and Moduli districts in Tanzania. Sixty three farmers from each of the two districts were interviewed. Data were analysed using SPSS computer package. All farmers (100%) practice an extensive production system where sheep graze together with cattle and goats. The majority (61.9%) of the farmers use communal land to graze their animals, and children are the main source (69.0%) of labour. Almost half (50.8%) of the farmers indicated to supplement their sheep with mainly (65.6%) maize bran. Identified constraints to production were diseases, drought, lack of capital, poor markets and extension services, thefts, and predators. A plastic apron was found to be an effective indigenous technique to control mating and practice seasonal breeding. Age at first lambing for the majority of Red Maasai sheep was 13 to 18 months and lambing intervals of 12 to 18 months. Most sheep lambed between October and January. Twinning cases were few (15.9%) indicating a low twinning rate in the population. Breeding rams were selected within flocks, and many farmers (95.2%) preferred seasonal breeding to allow ewes to lamb in the wet season. Disposals were done to get income, remove infertile ewes, and slaughter for food and rituals. Generally, the productivity of Red Maasai sheep was low due to poor husbandry practices. It was concluded that improved management was likely to enhance sustainable production and conserve the breed.

Keywords: Disposals, production system, productivity, Red Maasai sheep, reproduction.

References

  1. Armson B, Ekiri AB, Alafiatayo R, Cook AJ, Small Ruminant Production in Tanzania, Uganda, and Ethiopia: A Systematic Review of Constraints and Potential Solutions. Veterinary Sciences, 2020;8,5. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8010005.
     Google Scholar
  2. Devendra C and McLeroy GB, Goat and Sheep Production in the Tropics. Longman Group Limited., Harlow Essex, UK, 1982;271 pp.
     Google Scholar
  3. Gatenby RM, Sheep III. Tropical Agriculturalist. McMillan Publishers limited. Wageningen, The Netherlands; 2002.
     Google Scholar
  4. Adogla-Bessa T, Carles A, Gatengy R, Treacher T, Sheep. In: Livestock and Wealth Creation. Improving the husbandry of animals kept by resource-poor people in developing countries. (Edited by Owen, E., Kitalyi, A., Jayasuriya, N., and Smith, T.), Notingham, England. 2005;601 pp.
     Google Scholar
  5. Muigai AWT, Okeyo AM, Kwallah AK, Mburu D, Hanotte O, Characterization of sheep populations of Kenya using microsatellite markers: Implications for conservation and management of indigenous sheep populations. The South African Journal of Animal Science, 2009;3:9 93-96.
     Google Scholar
  6. Carles AB, Sheep Production in the Tropics. Maule, JP Oxford University Press: New York;1984.
     Google Scholar
  7. Tungu GB., Nkuba J, Gervas D, The contribution of small ruminants to the socio-economic welfare of households in the cotton-cereal farming systems of Sukumaland, Tanzania. Proceedings of the 30th Scientific Conference of the Tanzania Society of Animal Production, ed. Kifaro GC et al, pp. 97-107, vol 30, Tanga, Tanzania, 2003.
     Google Scholar
  8. Joy A, Dunshea FR, Leury BJ, Clarke IJ, DiGiacomo K, Chauhan SS, Resilience of Small Ruminants to Climate Change and Increased Environmental Temperature: A Review. Animals, 2020;10:867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10050867.
     Google Scholar
  9. Kurwijila RL and Kifaro GC, An overview of biodiversity of livestock in Tanzania. Proceeding of SUA – MU ENRECA project workshop. Ed. Kifaro GC et al, pp 1-26, Morogoro, Tanzania.
     Google Scholar
  10. Charray J, Humbert JM, Levif J, Manual of sheep production in the Humid Tropics of Africa. C.A.B. International. Wallingford, UK;1992.
     Google Scholar
  11. Kusiluka L and Kambarage D, Diseases of Small Ruminants in Sub-Saharan Africa. VETAID., Midlothian, Scotland. 1996.
     Google Scholar
  12. Michael S, Mbwambo N, Mruttu H, Dotto M, Ndomba C, da Silva M, Makusaro F, Nandonde S, Crispin J, and Shapiro B, Tanzania Livestock Sector Analysis (2016/2017-2031/2032);2018.
     Google Scholar
  13. Odenya WO, Reproductive traits and disease incidence characteristics of Dopper, Dopper x Maasai and Maasai ewes raised under semi-arid conditions in Kenya. Proceedings of the second Biennial Conference of the African Small Ruminants Research Network, ed. Lebbie, S.H.B et al, pp. 75-77, AICC, Arusha, Tanzania, 1992.
     Google Scholar
  14. Comoro CJ, Das SM., Laswai GH, Mbaga SH, Minja MMJ, Mruttu H, Msechu JKK, Mwaigomole GM, Mwilawa A, Nalitolela S, Sendalo S, Preferences and criteria employed in selection and breeding of livestock by the Maasai in Manyara region, Tanzania. Maasai men and women's local knowledge in breeding cattle. Proceeding for Breeding for a purpose; FAO, Rome, Italy. Report 1;2007.
     Google Scholar
  15. Dorji T, Tshering G, Wangchuk T, Rege JEO, Hannote O, Indigenous sheep genetic resources and management in Bhutan. Animal Genetic Resources Journal, 2003;33:81-91.
     Google Scholar
  16. Msechu JKK, Institutional frame work for animal genetic resources management in Tanzania. Proceeding of SUA – MU ENRECA project workshop. ed. Kifaro, GC et al, pp. 27-34, Morogoro, Tanzania 2001.
     Google Scholar
  17. Arora R, Bhatia S, Jain A, Morphological and genetic characterization of Ganjam sheep. Animal Genetic Resources Journal, 2010; 46: 1-9.
     Google Scholar
  18. Wanjala KB, Wesongah JO, Chemulit J, Wesonga FD, Harvesting indigenous knowledge for community development: Lessons from the Maasai pastoralists of Narok, Kenya. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 2006;1(4):312-321.
     Google Scholar
  19. Mandal A, Singh LB, Rout PK, The Muzaffarnagari sheep, mutton breed in India. Animal Genetic Resources Information Journal, 2000; 28:19-25.
     Google Scholar
  20. Sahana G, Gupta SC, Nivsarkar AE, The prolific sheep of India. Animal Genetic Resources Information Journal, 2001;37:55-63.
     Google Scholar
  21. Aphunu A, Okoedo-OKojie DU, Small ruminant production constraints among farmers in Ika north-east local government area of Delta state, Nigeria. Archives of Applied Science Research, 2011;3 (2):370-376.
     Google Scholar
  22. Tembley S, Bengaly K, Berckmoes W, Effect of strategic anthelmintic treatment on growth performance and survival rate of native lambs in the subhumid environment in Mali. Proceedings of the second Biennial Conference of the African Small Ruminants Research Network. ed. Lebbie SHB et al, pp. 133-136, AICC, Arusha, Tanzania. 1992.
     Google Scholar
  23. Mugambi JM, Bain RK, Wanyangu SW, Ihiga MA, Duncan JL, Murray M, Stear MJ, Resistance of four sheep breeds to natural and subsequent artificial Haemonchus contortus infection. Veterinary Parasitology, 1997;69:265-273.
     Google Scholar
  24. Karunanithi K, Parushothaman MR, Thiruvenkadan AK, Sigh G, Sadana DK, Murungan M, Breed characteristics of Mecheri sheep. Animal Genetic Resources Journal, 2005;37:53-62.
     Google Scholar