Research Article

Farmers and Consumers Awareness and Acceptance of the Novel Practice of Utilizing Insect Protein as an Alternative Protein Source in Poultry Feed: A Survey

Obed Opoku
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana
* Corresponding author
Jacob Alhassan Hamidu
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana
Benjamin Adjei-Mensah
University of Lomé, Togo
Bernard Quaye
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana
Victor Benante
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana
Michael Adu Amankrah
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana
Armstrong Donkor
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana
Comfort Charity Atuahene
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana
DOI icon 10.24018/ejfood.2023.5.3.673

Read Counter
678

Downloads
532

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2023-04-12
Published 2023-06-30

Read counter = 678 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

The use of insect protein as an alternative protein source in poultry feed has gained significant attention due to its potential benefits in terms of sustainability, cost-effectiveness, and reduced reliance on traditional protein sources. However, the adoption of this novel practice in the poultry industry may depend on awareness creation for farmers as healthy feed for poultry into the human food chain. This study aims to investigate poultry farmers' awareness and readiness to adopt insect protein as an alternative protein source for poultry. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using structured questionnaires administered to 177 poultry farmers and consumers in the Ashanti and Bono regions of Ghana by simple randomisation. The survey collected data on farm size, feed dynamics, protein sources, and awareness and readiness to adopt insect protein as a protein source in poultry feed. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics in the form of percentages and graphs. The study found that 75% of the farmers interviewed had a farm capacity of over 1,000 birds, making them medium to large-scale commercial farmers. However, the feed formulated was not always balanced. Some farmers fed an excess of the required protein levels. Furthermore, while 52% of farmers had knowledge of the insect as an alternative protein source only 3.8% were willing to adopt it. Additionally, 82.5% of the consumers are willing to patronise insect-fed-derived meat with the insect protein qualifying as an organic product. The study concludes that awareness of the use of insects as protein for poultry is important. There is a need to increase research on the benefits of insects to address meat and egg quality and benefits.

Keywords: insect protein awareness poultry acceptance survey

References

  1. Imathiu S. Benefits and food safety concerns associated with consumption of edible insects. NFS J, 2020; 18: 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.nfs.2019.11.002.
     Google Scholar
  2. Parolini M, Ganzaroli A, Bacenetti J. Earthworm as an alternative protein source in poultry and fish farming: current applications and future perspectives. Sci Tot Env, 2020; 734: 139460. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139460.
     Google Scholar
  3. Cao Y, Li D. Impact of increased demand for animal protein products in Asian countries: Implications on global food security. Anim Front, 2013; 3(3): 48-55. doi: 10.2527/af.2013-0024.
     Google Scholar
  4. Mulumpwa M. The potential of insect meal in improving food security in Malawi: an alternative of soybean and fishmeal in livestock feed. J Ins Food Feed, 2018; 4(4): 301-312.
     Google Scholar
  5. Gasco L, Biasato I, Dabbou S, Schiavone A, Gai F. Animals fed insect-based diets: State-of-the-art on digestibility, performance and product quality. Animals, 2019; 9(4): 170. doi: 10.3390/ani9040170.
     Google Scholar
  6. Star L, Arsiwalla T, Molist F, Leushuis R, Dalim M, Paul A. Gradual provision of live black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae to older laying hens: effect on production performance, egg quality, feather condition and behavior. Animals, 2020; 10(2): 216. doi: 10.3390/ani10020216
     Google Scholar
  7. European Union Commission: Guide food hygiene practice: for European Union (EU) producers of insects as food and feed. [internet] [cited 2022 Dec 12]; Available from: https://vmvt.lt/sites/default/files/point_a.03_ipiff_guide_version_10_a4_27.09.2022_clean.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  8. Verbeke W, Sans P, Van Loo EJ. Challenges and prospects for consumer acceptance of cultured meat. J Integr Agric, 2015; 14(2): 285-294. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60884-4.
     Google Scholar
  9. Kostecka J, Konieczna K, Cunha LM. Evaluation of insect-based food acceptance by representatives of polish consumers in the context of natural resources processing retardation. J Ecol Eng, 2017; 18(2): 166-174. doi: 10.12911/22998993/68301.
     Google Scholar
  10. Sogari G, Amato M, Biasato I, Chiesa S, Gasco L. The potential role of insects as feed: A multi-perspective review. Animals, 2019; 9(4): 119. doi: 10.3390/ani9040119.
     Google Scholar
  11. Onwezen MC, Reinders MJ, Verain MCD, Snoek HM. The development of a single-item Food Choice Questionnaire. Food Qua Pref, 2019; 71: 34-45.
     Google Scholar
  12. Roma R, Ottomano Palmisano G, De Boni A. Insects as novel food: A consumer attitude analysis through the dominance-based rough set approach. Foods, 2020; 9(4): 387. doi: 10.3390/foods9040387.
     Google Scholar
  13. Domingues CHDF, Borges JAR, Ruviaro CF, Gomes Freire Guidolin D, Rosa Mauad Carrijo J. Understanding the factors influencing consumer willingness to accept the use of insects to feed poultry, cattle, pigs and fish in Brazil. PloS one, 2020; 15(4): e0224059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224059.
     Google Scholar
  14. Szendrő K, Szabó-Szentgróti E, Szigeti O. Consumers’ attitude to consumption of rabbit meat in eight countries depending on the production method and its purchase form. Foods, 2020; 9(5): 654. doi: 10.3390/foods9050654.
     Google Scholar
  15. Naranjo‐Guevara N, Fanter M, Conconi AM, Floto‐Stammen S. Consumer acceptance among Dutch and German students of insects in feed and food. Food Sci Nutr, 2021; 9(1): 414-428. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2006.
     Google Scholar
  16. Ghana Statistical Service. National_Analytical_Report.pdf. Available Ghana Statistical Service. Population and housing census: national analytical report. Accra-Ghana [cited 20 Sep 2021]; Available from: https://statsghana.gov.gh/gssmain/fileUpload/pressrelease/2010_PHC.
     Google Scholar
  17. Quaye B, Asomani B, Adjei Mensah B, Benante V, Opoku O, Amankrah MA, Atuahene CC. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the poultry industry of Ghana: Case study in Kumasi Metropolis. International J Inno Sci Res Techn, 2022; 7(8): 1561-1572.
     Google Scholar
  18. Ali MS, Hossain MM. Factors influencing the performance of farmers in broiler production of Faridpur District in Bangladesh. World's Poult Sci J, 2010; 66(1): 123-131. doi: 10.1017/S0043933910000127.
     Google Scholar
  19. Amanor-Boadu V, Nti FK, Ross K. Structure of Ghana’s chicken industry in 2015. METSS. October.
     Google Scholar
  20. Ferket PR, Gernat AG. Factors that affect feed intake of meat birds: A review. Int J Poult Sci, 2006; 5(10): 905-911.
     Google Scholar
  21. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient requirements of poultry. Ninth Revised Ed. National Academy Press. Washington, DC, 1994.
     Google Scholar
  22. Day L, Cakebread JA, Loveday SM. Food proteins from animals and plants: Differences in the nutritional and functional properties. Trends Food Sci Tech, 2022; 119: 428-442. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.12.020.
     Google Scholar
  23. Mehrim AI, Refaey MM. An Overview of the Implication of Climate Change on Fish Farming in Egypt. Sustainability, 2023; 15(2): 1679. doi: 10.3390/su15021679.
     Google Scholar
  24. Kumar P, Mehta N, Abubakar AA, Verma AK, Kaka U, Sharma N, et al. Potential alternatives of animal proteins for sustainability in the food sector. Food Rev Int, 2022; 1-26. doi: 10.1080/87559129.2022.2094403.
     Google Scholar
  25. Bulinda CM, Gido EO, Kirscht H, Tanga CM. Gendered Awareness of Pig and Poultry Farmers on the Potential of Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) Farming in Kenya. Sustainability, 2023; 15(4): 3613. doi:10. 3390/su15043613.
     Google Scholar
  26. Omomule TG, Ajayi OO, Orogun AO. Fuzzy prediction and pattern analysis of poultry egg production. Comp Elec Agric, 2020; 171: 105301. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105301.
     Google Scholar
  27. Bermúdez-Serrano IM. Challenges and opportunities for the development of an edible insect food industry in Latin America. J Ins Food Feed, 2020; 6(5): 537-556. doi: 10.3920/JIFF2020.0009.
     Google Scholar
  28. Gałęcki R, Zielonka Ł, Zasȩpa M, Gołȩbiowska J, Bakuła T. Potential utilization of edible insects as an alternative source of protein in animal diets in Poland. Front Sus Food Sys, 2021; 5: 675796. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.675796.
     Google Scholar
  29. Mensah DO, Mintah FO, Oteng SA, Lillywhite R, Oyebode O. ‘We're meat, so we need to eat meat to be who we are’: Understanding motivations that increase or reduce meat consumption among emerging adults in the University of Ghana food environment. Meat Sci, 2022; 193: 108927. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108927.
     Google Scholar
  30. Alao A. Religion, Public Health and Human Security in Nigeria. Taylor & Francis, 2022.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)