##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The effectiveness of packaging materials on the quality and shelf life of local and hybrid varieties of guava was evaluated under refrigerated and room temperature. The treatment consisted of packaging with polythene, a perforated polyethylene bag, and control (without packaging. Different quality parameters such as physiological weight loss, decay loss, color and overall acceptability score, percentage of marketability, moisture content, total solid content, ash content, protein content, pH, titratable acidity, and vitamin C content were examined. The results showed that the vitamin C, pH content reduction rate is comparatively lower in the case of hybrid guava stored in perforated polythene packaged at refrigeration temperature compared to other treatments. An increase in titratable acidity content was recorded lowest in the case of deshi variety packaged with polythene stored at refrigeration temperature whereas hybrid variety packaged with perforated polythene stored at room temperature showed a higher rate of increase. Physiological weight loss and decay loss were recorded lowest for the sample packaged with a perforated polythene bag under the refrigerated condition while the control sample stored at normal room temperature showed the highest rate. Marketability of perforated polythene packaged fruits was recorded highest when that of the control one under normal room temperature was recorded the lowest. Performances of perforated polythene packaging system under the refrigerated temperature may be recommended for the longest shelf life and the highest quality of guava.

References

  1. Amin MN, Hossain MA, Miah MS, Hassan MS, Hoque MA. Development of suitable package for transportation of guava (Psidium guajava L.). Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research. 2014 Sep 15;39(2):337-50.
     Google Scholar
  2. Miano TF, Jokhio JA, Miano TF. Effect of different packaging materials and storage conditions on physicochemical characteristics of guava var Allahabadi. J. Agrofor. Environ. 2010;4(2):33-6.
     Google Scholar
  3. Begum SA, Rahim MA, Haider MA, Kader MA. Shelf Life of Ten Guava Varieties under Different Post Harvest Treatments in on Season. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 2002; 5: 1176-1180.
     Google Scholar
  4. Hossain MI, Rashid MA. Effects of maturity indices and modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) on shelf life and post-harvest quality of cherry tomato. Progressive Agriculture. 2021 Sep 20;32(1):43-59.
     Google Scholar
  5. Hassan MK. Quality management and safety assurance in Horticultural chains of Bangladesh. Research in Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries. 2014;1(1):1-1.
     Google Scholar
  6. Risse LA. Individual film wrapping of Florida fresh fruit and vegetables. InInternational Symposium on Postharvest Handling of Fruit and Vegetables 258 1988 Aug 29 (pp. 263-270).
     Google Scholar
  7. Deepak C, Rajesh K. Qualitative effect of wrapping and cushioning materials on guava fruits during storage. HortFlora Research Spectrum. 2012;1(4):318-22.
     Google Scholar
  8. Goyal A, Siddiqui S. Effects of ultraviolet irradiation, pulsed electric field, hot water dip and ethanol vapours treatment on keeping and sensory quality of mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) sprouts. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2014 Oct;51(10):2664-70.
     Google Scholar
  9. Mahajan BVC, Singh NP, Kumar M. Effect of different packaging films on shelf life and quality of pear fruits under supermarket conditions. HortFlora Research Spectrum (HRS). 2013; 2(1):68–71.
     Google Scholar
  10. Wijewardane RM, Guleria SP. Combined effects of pre-cooling, application of natural extracts and packaging on the storage quality of apple (Malus domestica) cv. royal delicious. Tropical Agricultural Research. 2009; 21(1):10–20.
     Google Scholar
  11. Hailu M, Seyoum Workneh T, Belew D. Effect of packaging materials on shelf life and quality of banana cultivars (Musa spp.). Journal of food science and technology. 2014 Nov;51(11):2947-63.
     Google Scholar
  12. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Horwitz W. Official methods of analysis. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 2005.
     Google Scholar
  13. Ranganna S. Hand Book of Analysis of Quality Control for Fruit and Vegetable Products. Second edition, Tata McGraw Hill Publications Company Limited, New Delhi. 2003; 4–30.
     Google Scholar
  14. Tiwari RB. Studies on blending of Guava and Papaya pulps for RTS beverage. Indian Food Packer. 2000;54(2):68-72.
     Google Scholar
  15. Shomodder A, Hossain M, Das P, Ranganathan T, Mazumder MA. Effect of Banana Leaf Extract, Pumpkin Seed Extract and Bee Honey Treatment on the Inhibition of Browning of Fresh Cut Guava. Journal of Agricultural Sciences–Sri Lanka. 2021 May 1;16(2).
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)