##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The purpose of the study was to compare the nutritional composition [carbohydrate, protein, moisture content, fat, ash, sugar, crude fiber] of four yard long bean cultivars in Bangladesh between 2020 and 21. Consumption of foods high in nutritional value offers a variety of anti-diabetic, anti-heart disease, and anti-cancer effects. The cultivars were high in different proximate composition, the cultivars evaluated had an energy content of 45.86 to 37.21 Kcal/100 g, a carbohydrate content of 6.20 to 8.33 g/100 g, a protein content of 2.72 to 3.22 g/100 g, a fat content of 0.10 to 0.18 g/100 g, a sugar content of 1.52 to 2.37 g/100 g, and a crude fiber content of 1.17 to 1.79 g/100 g. As a result, the cultivars under investigation could be recommended as a nutritional source in daily diets and could be used to treat coronary heart disease, diabetes, intestinal disorders, prostate, stomach ailments, and some cancer kinds.

References

  1. REFERENCES
     Google Scholar
  2. Amarowicz R, Pegg RB. Legumes as a source of natural antioxidants. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology. 2008; 110: 865-878.
     Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous. Agro-climatatrological data. Agromet Division, Bangladesh Meteorological Department, Joydebpur, Gazipur. 1995; 35-65.
     Google Scholar
  4. Yard long beans Nutrition facts and Health benefits. (n.d.). Nutrition and You.com. Retrieved from https://www.nutrition-and-you.com/yard-long-beans.html.
     Google Scholar
  5. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 17th ed. Gaithersburg MD ed. AOAC, Washington, DC.; 2002.
     Google Scholar
  6. Augustin J, Beck CB, Kalbfleish G, Kagel LC, Matthews RH. Variation in the Vitamin and Mineral Content of Raw and Cooked Commercial Phaseolus vulgaris Classes. Journal of Food Science, 1981; 46(6):1701-1706.
     Google Scholar
  7. Bednar GE, Patil AR, Murray SM, Grieshop CM, Merchen NR, Fahey GC. Starch and fibre fractions in selected food and feed ingredients affect their small intestinal digestibility and fermentability and their large bowel fermentability in vitro in a canine model. The Journal of Nutrition, 2001; 131(2): 276-286.
     Google Scholar
  8. Bravo L, Siddhuraju P, Saura-Calixto F. Composition of underexploited Indian pulses. Comparison with common legumes. Food Chemistry, 1999; 64(2): 185-192.
     Google Scholar
  9. Ceyhan E, Kahraman A, Önder M. The impacts of environment on plant products. International Journal of Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics, 2012; 2(1): 48-51.
     Google Scholar
  10. De Almeida, Costa GE, da Silva, Queiroz-Monici K, Pissini Machado, Reis SM, de Oliveira AC. Chemical composition, dietary fibre and resistant starch contents of raw and cooked pea, common bean, chickpea and lentil legumes. Food Chemistry, 2006; 94(3): 327-330.
     Google Scholar
  11. Duranti M, Gius C. Legume seeds: protein content and nutritional value. Field Crops Research, 1997; 53: 31-45.
     Google Scholar
  12. Giovannucci E, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, Fuchs C, Rosner BA, Speizer FE, Willett WC. Multivitamin use, folate, and colon cancer in women in the Nurses Health Study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1998; 129(7): 517- 524.
     Google Scholar
  13. Gonzalez A, Monteagudo AB, Casquero P, De Ron A, Santalla M. Genetic variation and environmental effects on agronomical and commercial quality traits in the main European market classes of dry bean. Field Crops Research, 2006; 95: 336-347.
     Google Scholar
  14. Kinaci G, Akin R, Kinaci E. Effect of different irrigation management on physical quality traits of field beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Celal Bayar University Journal of Science, 2008; 4(2): 179- 186.
     Google Scholar
  15. Kumar V, Rani A, Solanki S, Hussain S. Influence of growing environment on the biochemical composition and physical characteristics of soybean seed. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2006; 19(2): 188-195.
     Google Scholar
  16. Mack H, Singh J. Effect of high temperature on yield and carbohydrate composition of bush snap beans. Journal American Society of Horticultural Science, 1969; 94(1): 60-62.
     Google Scholar
  17. Malik AK, Ercan E, Yeliz KA. Determination of protein, vitamins, amino acids and mineral element content of Yenice and Pınarlı bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Turkish Journal of Food and Agriculture Sciences. 2019; 1 (1): 6-11.
     Google Scholar
  18. Mallillin AC, Trinidad TP, Raterta R, Dagbay K, Loyola AS. Dietary fibre and fermentability characteristics of root crops and legumes. British Journal of Nutrition, 2008;100(3): 485-488.
     Google Scholar
  19. Nokkoul R, Santipracha Q, Santipracha W. Crop production of yard long bean from organic seed. Journal of Science and Technology, 2009;17(1).
     Google Scholar
  20. Nordin E. Determination of vitamin B6 content in brown beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L) from Öland – The influence of cultivar, year of cultivation, geographical area and type of fertilizer, Analys av vitamin B6 innehåll i bruna bönor från Öland – påverkan av sorter, odlingsår, odlingsområde och typ av gödsel. Agriculture Programme-Food Science Molecular Sciences. 2017; 10: 1-56.
     Google Scholar
  21. Pereira HS, Melo LC, Del Peloso MJ, de Faria LC, Wendland A. Complex interaction between genotypes and growing seasons of carioca common bean in Goiás/Distrito Federal. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology. 2011; 11: 207-215.
     Google Scholar
  22. Shellie KC, Hosfield GL. Genotype x environmental effects on food quality of common bean: resource-efficient testing procedures. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 1991; 116(4): 732-736.
     Google Scholar
  23. Steel RG, Torrie JH, Dickey DA. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 3rd ed. Singapore: McGraw Hill Book International Co. 1997.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)