Development of Suitable Microclimate Using Low˗tech Greenhouse for Off-Season Production of High Value Crops in Bangladesh
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Low˗tech greenhouses (low˗techs) have been used globally to cultivate horticultural crops since many years, but their utilization in Bangladesh is a recent phenomenon. Moreover, information on altered microclimate inside the low˗tech is hardly reported. An investigation has been conducted in the Crop Botany Field Laboratory, Bangladesh Agricultural University (24o72´N, 90o43´E and 18 masl), Mymensingh during the late autumn to winter seasons from mid-October to mid-February of 2015/16, 2016/17 and 2017/18 years to find out the variation in microclimatic parameters between inside and outside of low˗techs and to evaluate the suitability of altered microclimate inside the low˗techs for off˗season production of high value crops in Bangladesh. Three low˗techs were erected in each year using bamboo frame covered with single inflated polyethylene film (thickness = 0.2 mm). Major microclimatic parameters inside and aside outside the low˗techs were measured with standard devices or techniques. Around 30 percent incoming photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) was cut˗off by low˗tech cover during solar noon when the sun’s zenith gets minimum value (around 0o). However, this cut˗off portion of PAR was gradually increased with the sunrise and sunset when zenith is around 90o. During the daytime, low˗tech retains higher air temperature than that found at outside and the differences in air temperature between inside and outside of low˗techs was gradually increased after sunrise with a peak difference of 7 to 9 oC following the solar noon (i.e., 13:00-14:00 hour). No distinct variation in relative humidity was recorded between inside and outside of the low˗tech. Low˗tech cover retains higher soil temperature than that was recorded in outside. The variation of both air and soil temperatures between inside and outside of low˗techs was higher during the daytime but lower at nighttime or even at daytime when the sky remained overcast. The variation in microclimatic parameters under low˗techs not only protect the growing crops from climate vagaries during autumn, winter and spring seasons but also provide suitable warmer environment for growing many high value crops during that seasons and thus crop production in off˗season and/or season extension benefits can easily be achieved by low˗techs.
References
-
S. Singh, D. R. Singh, A. Velmurugan, I. Jaisankar, T. P. Swarnam. Coping with climatic uncertainties through improved production technologies in tropical island conditions. In: Biodiversity and Climate Change Adaptation in Tropical Islands. C. Sivaperuman, A. Velmurugan, A. K. Singh, I. Jaisankar (Eds.). Elsevier Inc., pp. 623–666, 2018.
Google Scholar
1
-
T. Blomgren, T. Frisch. High tunnels: using low-cost technology to increase yields, improve quality and extend the season. SARE (Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education), 2007. Retrieved on 20 July 2020.
Google Scholar
2
-
A. Singh, A. Syndor, B. C. Deka, R. K. Singh, R. K. Patel. The effect of microclimate inside low tunnels on off season production of strawberry (Frageria × Anamosa Duch.). Scientia Horticulturae, 2012;144: 36–41.
Google Scholar
3
-
W. J. Lamont Jr. Overview of the use of high tunnels worldwide. HortTechnology, 2009;19(1):25–29.
Google Scholar
4
-
https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.19.1.25.
Google Scholar
5
-
G. Rogers. An investigation of low‐cost protective cropping – VG13075. Horticulture Innovation Australia – Final Report. Applied Horticultural Research, 2018.
Google Scholar
6
-
M. L. Engel, P. C. F. Junior, A. C. Ikeda, G. B. de Alcantara, A. R. Higa. Use of mini polytunnels for the maintenance of a clone garden of Acacia mearnsii De Wildeman in different seasons of the year. Revista FLORESTA, 2018;48(4):601–608.
Google Scholar
7
-
https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v48i4.57602.
Google Scholar
8
-
[7]S. A. Adams, K. A. Todd, “High tunnel design, site development, and construction”, The Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska on behalf of the University of Nebraska–Lincoln Extension, 2015.
Google Scholar
9
-
L. Sagar. Exotic and uncommon vegetable production in poly tunnels. In: Protected Cultivation and Smart Agriculture. S. Maitra, D.J. Gaikwad, T. Shankar (Eds.). New Delhi Publishers, New Delhi: 2020, pp. 146–160. https://doi.org/10.30954/NDP-PCSA.2020.15.
Google Scholar
10
-
V. S. Negi, R. K. Maikhuri, L. S. Rawat, D. Parshwan. Protected cultivation as an option of livelihood in mountain region of central Himalaya, India. The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 2013;20(5):416–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2013.799103.
Google Scholar
11
-
P. Dahiya, K. Singh. Polyhouse Farming: A New Concept of Agriculture. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika, 2018;33:109–112. https://arccjournals.com/journal/bhartiya-krishi-anusandhan-patrika/BKAP97l; 2018. accessed on 15 September 2021.
Google Scholar
12
-
H. C. Wien. Microenvironmental variations within the high tunnel. Horticultural Science, 2009; 44: 235–238.
Google Scholar
13
-
J. S. Cowan, C. A. Miles, P. K. Andrews, D. A. Inglis. Biodegradable mulch performed comparably to polyethylene in high tunnel tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L) production. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2014;94:1854–1864.
Google Scholar
14
-
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6504.
Google Scholar
15
-
Y. Zhao, M. Gu, G. B. Evans, R. Harkess. Planting date effect on yield of tomato, eggplant, pepper, zinnia, and snapdragon in high tunnel in Mississippi. Journal of Crop Improvement, 2014;28: 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2013.858283.
Google Scholar
16
-
D. F. Russel, “MSTAT-C Package Programme. Crop and Soil Science Department, Michigan State University, USA. 1986.
Google Scholar
17
-
G. P. Mishra, N. Singh, H. Kumar, S. B. Singh. Protected cultivation for food and nutritional security at Ladakh. Defence Science Journal, 2010;60 (2):219–225.
Google Scholar
18
-
M. Job. Study on changes in microclimatic parameters under poly-house with different color plastic mulching during tomato cultivation. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, SP1: 689–694, 2018.
Google Scholar
19
-
H. C. Anderson, M. A. Rogers, E. E. Hoover. Low tunnel covering and microclimate, fruit yield, and quality in an organic strawberry production system. HortTechnology, 2019;29(5):590–598. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH04319-19.
Google Scholar
20
-
N. J. Rosenberg, B. L. Blad, S. B. Verma. Microclimate: The Biological Environment. Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1983.
Google Scholar
21
-
E. Maynard, M. O’Donnell. Managing the environment in high tunnels for cool season vegetable production. Horticulture & Landscape Architecture, High Tunnel Series, HO-297-W. Purdue University Extension. 2019. https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/HO/HO-297-W.pdf; accessed on 17 September 2021.
Google Scholar
22
-
A. Ollila. The Greenhouse Effect Definition. Physical Science International Journal, 2019;23(2):1–5.
Google Scholar
23
-
https://doi.org/10.9734/PSIJ/2019/v23i230149.
Google Scholar
24
-
A. B. Ogden, M. W. Van Iersel. Southern highbush blueberry production in high tunnels: temperatures, development, yield, and fruit quality during the establishment years. Horticultural Science, 2009;44:1850–1856.
Google Scholar
25
-
A. Jinu, V. M. Abdul Hakkim. Performance of a low cost automation system for greenhouse cooling. International Journal of Current Research, 2018;10(08):72158–72163.
Google Scholar
26
-
K. C. Priya, Er. I. Bhagat, N. Kumar. Influence of climatic parameters on performance of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) under protected cultivation. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 2018;6(3):1599–1602.
Google Scholar
27
-
M. A. Awal, M. A. H. Khan. Alteration of soil temperature and moisture through mulching on the morpho-physiological differentiation in maize. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 1999;2(4):1164–1167. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.1999.1164.1167.
Google Scholar
28
-
M. A. Awal, M. A. H. Khan. Mulch induced eco-physiological growth and yield of maize. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 2000;2(4):61–64. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2000.61.64.
Google Scholar
29
-
M. A. Awal, T. Ikeda. Controlling canopy formation, flowering, and yield in field-grown stands of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) with ambient and regulated soil temperature. Field Crops Research, 2003;81(2-3). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00216-2.
Google Scholar
30
-
O. O. Soneye, M. A. Ayoola, I. A. Ajao, O. O. Jegede. Diurnal and seasonal variations of the incoming solar radiation flux at a tropical station, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Heliyon, 2019;5(5):e01673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01673.
Google Scholar
31
-
H. Oz, A. Atilgan, B. Buyuktas, T. Alagoz. The efficiency of fan-pad cooling system in greenhouse and building up of internal greenhouse temperature map. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2009;8(20): 5436–5444.
Google Scholar
32
-
K. Demchak. Small fruit production in high tunnels. HortTechnology, 2009;19(1):44–49.
Google Scholar
33
-
S. Singh, A. K. Saxena. Protected cultivation of summer squash in mid-hills of Uttarakhand. Journal of Horticultural Science and Research, 2020;3(1):82–85.
Google Scholar
34
-
B. Singh, M. Kumar, N. P. S. Sirohi. Protected cultivation of cucurbits under low-cost protected structure: a sustainable technology for peri-urban areas of northern India. Acta Horticulturae, 2007;31: 267–272.
Google Scholar
35
-
N. Kumar, G. Singh. Protected cultivation of parthenocarpic brinjal (Solanum melongena L.). International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research, 2015;4(1):105–106.
Google Scholar
36