Bioconversion of Shrimp Waste with Fermentation Stage Process on Proximate Analysis and Digestibility Values of Feed



Abstract Views
484

Downloads
378

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Nov 4, 2021
Published Nov 26, 2021
10.24018/ejfood.2021.3.6.409

Abstract viewed = 484 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Frozen shrimp processing waste has the potential to be used as feed, but the characteristics of the shrimp shells need to be improved so that they can be digested. Fermentation using three types of microbes in stages has been studied, to determine the optimal processing time that yields proximate values and protein digestibility of shrimp waste concentrate. Completely randomized design (CRD), 3 treatments and 7 replications, conducted with treatments of shrimp waste bioconversion in stage over time, T1 = Bacillus licheniformis (Bl.) 1 day + Lactobacillus sp. (Ls.) 1 day; + Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc) 1 day; T2 = Bl. 2 days + Ls. 2 days + Sc = 2 days; T3 = Bl. 3 days + Ls. 3 days + Sc = 3 days. Product of shrimp waste bioconversion was used as a nutrient concentrate in dietary of local poultry (CP 15%, ME 2750 kcal/kg). The best proximate analysis value showed that each stage overtime two days of bioconversion with Bacillus licheniformis, followed by Lactobacillus sp. and finally fermented by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The proximate analysis resulted that the Crude Protein of product bioconversion was 48.5%. Extract ether, Calcium and Phosphorous contents respectively were 7.81%, 7.57% and 3.14%. The best value of digestibility of protein feed containing bioconversion product of concentrations of local poultry was 72.91%.

Keywords: digestibility value, local poultry, proximate analysis, stage of bioconversion, the waste of shrimp processing

References

  1. A. Abun, D. Saefulhadjar, T. Widjastuti, K. Haetami, and R. Wiradimadja. Energy-Protein-Concentrate as Product of Glucosamine Extract from Shrimp Waste on Performance Of native Chicken. Int. J. Environ. Agric. Biotechnol., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1341–1346, 2017, DOI: 10.22161/ijeab/2.3.41.
     Google Scholar
  2. S. Leeson and J. D. Summers, Commercial Poultry Nutrition Third Edition. 2012.
     Google Scholar
  3. S. Kumari and R. Kishor, Chitin and chitosan: origin, properties, and applications. INC, 2020.
     Google Scholar
  4. Y. H. Lim, H. L. Foo, T. C. Loh, R. Mohamad, and N. Abdullah. Comparative studies of versatile extracellular proteolytic activities of lactic acid bacteria and their potential for extracellular amino acid productions as feed supplements. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2019, DOI: 10.1186/s40104-019-0323-z.
     Google Scholar
  5. D. M. Palmerín-Carreño, A. L. Hernández-Orihuela, and A. Martínez-Antonio. Production of D-lactate from avocado seed hydrolysates by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli JU15. Fermentation, vol. 5, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.3390/fermentation5010026.
     Google Scholar
  6. K. HAETAMI, A. Abun, and Y. MULYANI. Prebiotics(BAS) (Bacillus sp., Aspergillus n., and Saccharomyces c.) as Feed Supplement on Nutrients and its Effects on Digestibility Value of Fish Feed. Int. J. Environ. Agric. Biotechnol., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1825–1830, 2018, DOI: 10.22161/ijeab/3.5.34.
     Google Scholar
  7. A. E. El-Beltagy and S. M. El-Sayed. Functional and nutritional characteristics of protein recovered during isolation of chitin from shrimp waste. Food Bioprod. Process., vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 633–638, 2012, DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2012.06.004.
     Google Scholar
  8. D. Ibrahim et al. Effect of dietary modulation of selenium form and level on performance, tissue retention, quality of frozen stored meat and gene expression of antioxidant status in ross broiler chickens. Animals, vol. 9, no. 6, 2019, DOI: 10.3390/ani9060342.
     Google Scholar
  9. Abun, T. Widjastuti, K. Haetami, D. Rusmana, and Jhondri, “Nutrient Concentrate Fermentation Based Shrimp Waste and Effect on Production Performance Phase Layer Native Chicken,” Sci. Pap. D-Animal Sci., vol. 60, pp. 55–60, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  10. V. Varelas. Food wastes as a potential new source for edible insect mass production for food and feed: A review. Fermentation, vol. 5, no. 3, 2019, DOI: 10.3390/fermentation5030081.
     Google Scholar
  11. T. Nolte et al. Growth performance of local chicken breeds, a high-performance genotype and their crosses fed with regional faba beans to replace soy. Animals, vol. 10, no. 4, 2020, DOI: 10.3390/ani10040702.
     Google Scholar
  12. Abun, T. Widjastuti, and K. Haetami. Effect of Time Processing at Steps of Bioprocess Shrimp Waste by Three Microbes on Protein Digestibility and Metabolizable Energy Products of Native Chicken. Agrolife Sci. J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 209–213, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://agrolifejournal.usamv.ro/index.php/scientific-papers/260-effect-of-time-processing-at-steps-of-bioprocess-shrimp-waste-by-three-microbes-on-protein-digestibility-and-metabolizable-energy-products-of-native-chicken#spucontentCitation31.
     Google Scholar
  13. K. Haetami, I. Zidni, R. Rostika, and W. Ginanjar. Article no. AJFAR.51202 Reviewers: (1) Rakpong PetHaetami, K., Zidni, I., Rostika, R., & Ginanjar, W. (2019). Article no. AJFAR.51202 Reviewers: (1) Rakpong Petkam. In Asian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Research (Vol. 4, Issue 4).kam, 2019.
     Google Scholar
  14. F. Lyu, M. Thomas, W. H. Hendriks, and A. F. B. van der Poel. Size reduction in feed technology and methods for determining, expressing and predicting particle size: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., vol. 261, no. November 2019, p. 114347, 2020, DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114347.
     Google Scholar
  15. E. Sahara, T. Widjastuti, R. L. Balia, and A. Abun. The Effect of Chitosan Addition to the Digestibility of Dried Matter, Organic Matter and Crude Protein of Tegal’s Duck Rations. Indones. J. Fundam. Appl. Chem., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 35–39, 2018, DOI: 10.24845/ijfac.v3.i2.35.
     Google Scholar
  16. C. O. Brito et al. Metabolizable energy and nutrient digestibility of shrimp waste meal obtained from extractive fishing for broilers. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., vol. 263, no. August 2019, p. 114467, 2020, DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114467.
     Google Scholar
  17. T. T. Nguyen, A. R. Barber, P. Smith, X. Luo, and W. Zhang. Application and optimization of the highly efficient and environmentally-friendly microwave-intensified lactic acid demineralization of deproteinized Rock lobster shells (Jasus edwardsii) for chitin production. Food Bioprod. Process., vol. 102, pp. 367–374, 2017, DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2017.02.005.
     Google Scholar
  18. K. H. Lin and Y. H. Yu. Evaluation of bacillus licheniformis-fermented feed additive as an antibiotic substitute: Effect on the growth performance, diarrhea incidence, and cecal microbiota in weaning piglets. Animals, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1–16, 2020, DOI: 10.3390/ani10091649.
     Google Scholar
  19. J. Trela, B. Kierończyk, V. Hautekiet, and D. Józefiak. Combination of bacillus licheniformis and salinomycin: Effect on the growth performance and gut microbial populations of broiler chickens. Animals, vol. 10, no. 5, 2020, DOI: 10.3390/ani10050889.
     Google Scholar
  20. Y. Guo, S. Xie, J. S. Yuan, and K. C. Kao. Effects of seawater on carotenoid production and lipid content of engineered saccharomyces cerevisiae. Fermentation, vol. 5, no. 1, 2019, DOI: 10.3390/fermentation5010006.
     Google Scholar
  21. S. M. Ghoreyshi et al. Effects of dietary supplementation of l-carnitine and excess lysine-methionine on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and immunity markers of broiler chicken. Animals, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1–17, 2019, DOI: 10.3390/ani9060362.
     Google Scholar
  22. F. C. Wilson, “Basic Processes Edited by.”
     Google Scholar
  23. M. Flis et al. The influence of the partial replacing of inorganic salts of Calcium, Zinc, Iron, and Copper with amino acid complexes on bone development in male pheasants from aviary breeding. Animals, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1–12, May 2019, DOI: 10.3390/ani9050237.
     Google Scholar
  24. W. Wizna, H. Abbas, Y. Rizal, A. Dharma, and I. Putu Kompiang. Selection and Identification of Cellulase-Producing Bacteria Isolated from the Litter of Mountain and Swampy Forest. Microbiol. Indonesia., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 135–139, 2007, DOI: 10.5454/mi.1.3.7.
     Google Scholar
  25. X. Mao, N. Guo, J. Sun, and C. Xue. Comprehensive utilization of shrimp waste based on biotechnological methods: A review. J. Clean. Prod., vol. 143, pp. 814–823, 2017, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.042.
     Google Scholar
  26. C. T. Doan, T. N. Tran, V. B. Nguyen, T. P. K. Vo, A. D. Nguyen, and S. L. Wang. Chitin extraction from shrimp waste by liquid fermentation using an alkaline protease-producing strain, Brevibacillus parabrevis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol., vol. 131, pp. 706–715, 2019, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.117.
     Google Scholar
  27. A. Haddar, N. Schmidt, O. Ghorbel-Bellaaj, N. Fakhfakh-Zouari, A. Sellami-Kamoun, and M. Nasri. Alkaline proteases produced by Bacillus licheniformis RP1 grown on shrimp wastes: Application in chitin extraction, chicken feather-degradation and as a dehairing agent. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 669–678, 2011, DOI: 10.1007/s12257-010-0410-7.
     Google Scholar
  28. B. Cheba, T. Zaghloul, M. El-Massry, and A. El-Mahdy. Kinetics Properties of Marine Chitinase from Novel Red Sea Strain of Bacillus. Procedia Engineering, vol. 181, 2017, DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.383.
     Google Scholar
  29. O. D. Friesen, W. Guenter, R. R. Marquardt, and B. A. Rotter. The effect of enzyme supplementation on the apparent metabolizable energy and nutrient digestibilities of wheat, barley, oats, and rye for the young broiler chick. Poult. Sci., vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 1710–1721, 1992, DOI: 10.3382/ps.0711710.
     Google Scholar
  30. D. Pettersson and P. Åman. Enzyme supplementation of a poultry diet containing rye and wheat. Br. J. Nutr., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 139–149, Jul. 1989, DOI: 10.1079/bjn19890014.
     Google Scholar
  31. S. Sawhney and J. K. Mishra. Bioactive potential of bacterial endosymbionts isolated from Lamellodysidea herbacea, marine sponge from the coast of South Andaman, India, against human bacterial pathogens/ J. Appl. Pharm. Sci., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1–8, Mar. 2019, DOI: 10.7324/JAPS.2019.90301.
     Google Scholar
  32. M. Kist and S. Bereswill. Campylobacter jejuni. Contrib. Microbiol., vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 150–165, 2001, DOI: 10.1159/000060405.
     Google Scholar
  33. Abun, T. Widjastuti, and K. Haetami. Bioprocessing of Shrimp Waste and its Effect on the Production and Quality of Eggs from Domestic Laying Hens. Int. J. Poult. Sci., vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 530–537, Oct. 2019, DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2019.530.537.
     Google Scholar
  34. F. A. Carey and R. J. Sundberg, Advanced organic chemistry Part B: Reactions and Synthesis. 2008.
     Google Scholar
  35. N. S. Punekar and N. S. Punekar, Enzyme Kinetic Data: Collection and Analysis. 2018.
     Google Scholar
  36. P. Ambigaipalan and F. Shahidi. Bioactive peptides from shrimp shell processing discards: Antioxidant and biological activities. J. Funct. Foods, vol. 34, pp. 7–17, 2017, DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2017.04.013.
     Google Scholar
  37. X. Mao et al. Antioxidant properties of bioactive substances from shrimp head fermented by bacillus licheniformis OPL-007. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., vol. 171, no. 5, pp. 1240–1252, 2013, DOI: 10.1007/s12010-013-0217-z.
     Google Scholar
  38. S. K. Rout. Physicochemical, functional and spectroscopic analysis of crawfish chitin and chitosan as affected by process modification. ProQuest Diss. Theses, p. 162, 2001, [Online]. Available: https://search.proquest.com/docview/304700997?accountid=27575.
     Google Scholar
  39. M. B. Rao, A. M. Tanksale, M. S. Ghatge, and V. V. Deshpande. Molecular and Biotechnological Aspects of Microbial Proteases. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 597–635, Sep. 1998, DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.62.3.597-635.1998.
     Google Scholar
  40. S. L. Wang, T. Y. Kao, C. L. Wang, Y. H. Yen, M. K. Chern, and Y. H. Chen. A solvent stable metalloprotease produced by Bacillus sp. TKU004 and its application in the deproteinization of squid pen for β-chitin preparation. Enzyme Microb. Technol., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 724–731, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.12.007.
     Google Scholar
  41. E. Sahara, T. Widjastuti, R. L. Balia, and Abun. The Effect of Chitosan in the Ration on Tegal Duck Performance. Sci. Pap. Ser. D, Anim. Sci. - Int. Sess. Sci. Commun. Fac. Anim. Sci., vol. 59, pp. 108–111, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=120566635&amp%0Alang=es&site=ehost-live.
     Google Scholar