Study of the Chemical Composition of Hylocereus Undatus and Its Utility after Dehydration



Abstract Views
847

Downloads
575

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Aug 26, 2021
Published Sep 21, 2021
10.24018/ejfood.2021.3.5.365

Abstract viewed = 847 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This research deals with the characterization of dragon fruit for the purpose of consumption in different forms. Dragon fruit is supposed to be very nutritious and is rich source of several Phyto-chemicals. However, till now its utility in country like India is highly underrated. Dragon fruit has been found to be rich in antioxidants as well thus providing a wider scope for the research [1]. The fruit also contains high amount of minerals and balanced content of nutrients. High amount of dietary fiber and carotenoids make it beneficial for chronic heart disorders, cancer, and diabetes [1].

The paper highlights the nutritive attribute of fruit pulp and to increase its use as a dehydrated powder keeping the nutritive value intact. The dehydrated form increases the shelf life and is easy to use and also eases the distribution and transportation of fruit.

Keywords: Dehydration Dragon Fruit Nutritional Phyto-chemical

References

  1. P. Rathore, S. Seth, L. Kaba, “Study of antioxidant properties of Hylocereus undatus (Dragon Fruit),” National Conference on Global Perspective towards Green Pharmacy and Modern Era of Phyto-Pharmaceuticals. Published in International journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and research Special Edition vol. 30, pp. 88-90, 2020.
     Google Scholar
  2. “Hylocereus undatus (dragon fruit)”. CABI. 3 January 2018. Retrieved 19 April 2018.
     Google Scholar
  3. T. Perween, KK Mandal, MA Hasan, “Dragon fruit: An exotic super future fruit of India,” J Pharmacogn Phytochem vol. 7(2), pp. 1022-1026, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  4. M. Islam, M. Khan, M. Hoque and M. Rahman, “Studies on the Processing and Preservation of Dragon Fruit (Hylocereus undatus) Jelly,” The Agriculturists, vol. 10(2), pp. 29-35, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3329/agric.v10i2.13139.
     Google Scholar
  5. B. Jamilah, C.E. Shu, M. Kharidah, M.A. Dzulkifly, and A. Noranizan, “Physico-chemical characteristics of red pitaya (Hylocereus polyrhizus) peel,” International Food Research Journal, vol. 18, pp. 279-286, 2011
     Google Scholar
  6. K. Mahattanatawee, J.A. Manthey, G. Luzio, S.T. Talcott, K. Goodner, and E.A. Baldwin, “Total antioxidant activity and fiber content of select florida-grown tropical fruits,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 54, pp. 7355-7363, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  7. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf060566s.
     Google Scholar
  8. H.P. Gunasena, D.K.N.G. Pushpakumara, and M. Kariawasam, “Underutilized fruit trees in Sri Lanka: Dragon fruit Hylocereus undatus (Haw.),” Britton and Rose, pp. 110-141. World agroforestry centre ICRAF, New Delhi, India, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  9. G. Kansci, B.B. Koubala, and I.L. Mbome, “Biochemical and physicochemical properties of four mango varieties and some quality characteristics of their jams,” Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, vol. 32, pp. 644-655, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4549.2008.00204.x.
     Google Scholar
  11. F.C. Stintzing., A. Schieber, and R. Carle, “Evaluation of colour properties and chemical quality parameters of cactus juices,” European Food Research Technology, vol. 216, pp. 303-311, 2003.
     Google Scholar
  12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-002-0657-0.
     Google Scholar
  13. T.C. Chemah, A. Aminah, A. Noriham, and W.M.W. Aida, “Determination of pitaya seeds as a natural antioxidant and source of essential fatty acids,” International Food Research Journal, vol. 17, pp. 1003-1010, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  14. M. Sonawane, “Nutritive and medicinal value of dragon fruit. The Asian Journal of Horticulture,” vol. 12, pp. 267-271, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  15. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/TAJH/12.2/267-271.
     Google Scholar
  16. D. Roberts, “Qualitative and quantitative determination of the wheat leaf carbohydrates,” Canadian Journal of Research, vol. 28C. pp. 754-779, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjr50c-049.
     Google Scholar
  17. N. Soltani, “Quantitative and qualitative analysis of proteins in gonads of Donax trunculus from the Annaba Bay: effects of site, season and sex,” Advances in Environmental Biology, vol. 8, pp. 740-749, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  18. N. Abdulkadir & M. Tsuchiya. “One-step method for quantitative and qualitative analysis of fatty acids in marine animal samples,” Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology – J EXP MAR BIOL ECOL, vol. 354. pp. 1-8, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2007.08.024.
     Google Scholar
  20. Dt. Patil & Kd, Gurav & A.S. Kadam & Thite, Sachin & Rb. Thoke & Kore, Dr. B., “Qualitative analysis of secondary metabolites from some filicales members,” IJRPC, vol. 3, pp. 300-302, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  21. Z. Marsden & P. Gray & G. Nippard & M. Quinlan, “Evaluation of the DNS method for analysing lignocellulosic hydrolysates. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology,” vol. 32, pp. 1016–1022, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5030320744.
     Google Scholar
  22. J. Waterborg & H. Matthews, “The Lowry Method for Protein Quantitation,” 1996. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-259-9_2.
     Google Scholar
  23. N. Phisut “Spray drying technique of fruit juice powder: some factors influencing the properties of product,” International food research journal, vol. 19 (2012), pp. 1297-1306.
     Google Scholar
  24. V.R. Sagar, S. Kumar, P., “Recent advances in drying and dehydration of fruits and vegetables: a review,” J Food Sci Technol, vol. 47, pp. 15–26, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-010-0010-8.
     Google Scholar
  25. S. Argandoña, Eliana & Y. Luciane & C. Tais & Giunco, Aline, “Mango dehydration: influence of osmotic pre-treatment and addition of calcium chloride,” Revista Brasileira de Fruti cultura, vol. 40, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  26. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452018419.
     Google Scholar